Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 19,100
Registered: ‎06-17-2015

@Melvin-QVC

 

Hi Melvin: There appears to be some confusion now about what is religious and what is not since "religion"  is not mentioned in the Standards.

 

If a poster asks for prayers would that be removed now?

If a poster says that they will pray for another poster is that also forbidden now?

 

I understand about copyrights but it would be helpful to know exactly what we can and cannot say.   I can respect the decision but I am honestly a bit leery about what to say

 

Thank you for your help.

 

 

"" Compassion is a verb."-Thich Nhat Hanh
Valued Contributor
Posts: 560
Registered: ‎03-18-2012

Not sure if this pertains, but there are editions of the Bible which are free of copyright restriction.

Super Contributor
Posts: 337
Registered: ‎04-09-2014

Re: Posting Question

[ Edited ]

 

@Cakers3

 

 

Was copyright infringement part of the problem?

I'd like to understand that better as I have posted c&p items on the boards. tia! Smiley Happy

 

 

Valued Contributor
Posts: 803
Registered: ‎05-25-2016

The reason cited for deleting two posts was that the posts "could be deemed as religious."  So I don't think it's a copyright problem. Hopefully, Melvin will reply. I, too, read the standards and couldn't find any mention of religion. 

Honored Contributor
Posts: 21,016
Registered: ‎07-26-2014

Nor is religion mentioned in the "General Terms and Conditions."

"Never argue with a fool. Onlookers may not be able to tell the difference."


220-AuCC-US-CRM-Header-Update.gif

Super Contributor
Posts: 337
Registered: ‎04-09-2014

Re: Posting Question

[ Edited ]

@Ruby Laine wrote:

The reason cited for deleting two posts was that the posts "could be deemed as religious."  So I don't think it's a copyright problem. Hopefully, Melvin will reply. I, too, read the standards and couldn't find any mention of religion. 


 

@Ruby Laine, I looked back after seeing today's posts and found at least one of her threads was deleted for the reason of "This post has been removed by QVC because it is copyright infringement."

Valued Contributor
Posts: 803
Registered: ‎05-25-2016

That could be, @AuberriJean. On the thread started today, I must have missed it. I know there was an "inappropriate," "inappropriate information," and "religious."  

 

Maybe the Standards will need reviewed and revised so they are more clear. 

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 7,829
Registered: ‎03-18-2010

They are so inconsistent on what is allowed. What one person can say, another can't. One callout thread to see how a poster is, is allowed yet another call out thread for another poster is deleted. It depends on who you are here. 

Those who make peaceful revolution impossible will make violent revolution inevitable.
JFK
Trusted Contributor
Posts: 1,766
Registered: ‎06-15-2016

@Irshgrl31201 wrote:

They are so inconsistent on what is allowed. What one person can say, another can't. One callout thread to see how a poster is, is allowed yet another call out thread for another poster is deleted. It depends on who you are here. 


Wow, I've not noticed that before.  I've seen things deleted, but not really understood most of the 'reasoning'.

 

IT SHOULD NEVER DEPEND WHO YOU ARE, that is outrageous.

 

I will have to pay more attention to the deletions, and fire back some questions regarding those deletions.

 

If it's not in the 'rule book stated by QVC herein', it better appear in the rule book soon.

Super Contributor
Posts: 337
Registered: ‎04-09-2014

@Ruby Laine wrote:

That could be, @AuberriJean. On the thread started today, I must have missed it. I know there was an "inappropriate," "inappropriate information," and "religious."  

 

Maybe the Standards will need reviewed and revised so they are more clear. 

 


 

Yes! The Standards need to be more clear!