<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic LUNCHTIME SPECIALS - UNAPPETIZING? in Suggestion Box</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Suggestion-Box/LUNCHTIME-SPECIALS-UNAPPETIZING/m-p/109892#M904</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Just looked at the lunchtime specials - all 6 of them (usually they have 2 or 3 past their prime offers).  Can't the "Q"do any better with their choices?  They NEVER have my size (2x).  The prices aren't all that special anyway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>theonlydiva</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-08-29T16:10:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>LUNCHTIME SPECIALS - UNAPPETIZING?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Suggestion-Box/LUNCHTIME-SPECIALS-UNAPPETIZING/m-p/109892#M904</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Just looked at the lunchtime specials - all 6 of them (usually they have 2 or 3 past their prime offers).  Can't the "Q"do any better with their choices?  They NEVER have my size (2x).  The prices aren't all that special anyway.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Aug 2011 16:10:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Suggestion-Box/LUNCHTIME-SPECIALS-UNAPPETIZING/m-p/109892#M904</guid>
      <dc:creator>theonlydiva</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-08-29T16:10:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

