<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic computer-generated models on dot.com? in Suggestion Box</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Suggestion-Box/computer-generated-models-on-dot-com/m-p/345524#M2601</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;most people probably don't care or notice, but I think it stinks that Q took away the real models and put these fake computer-generated models on QVC dot.com. You can tell they aren't real because all the body parts look the same if you look closely. How fake can you get ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 23:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>cindy sue</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-03T23:46:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>computer-generated models on dot.com?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Suggestion-Box/computer-generated-models-on-dot-com/m-p/345524#M2601</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;most people probably don't care or notice, but I think it stinks that Q took away the real models and put these fake computer-generated models on QVC dot.com. You can tell they aren't real because all the body parts look the same if you look closely. How fake can you get ?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Aug 2013 23:46:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Suggestion-Box/computer-generated-models-on-dot-com/m-p/345524#M2601</guid>
      <dc:creator>cindy sue</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-03T23:46:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

