<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Look Familiar? in Jewelry</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217143#M67027</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;this is even worse:&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.qvc.com/" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:47:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>BGDC</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-09-03T18:47:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Look Familiar?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217133#M67025</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Wow, these new Diamonique (not Ripka) earrings look mighty familiar to me...J317961, $49.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="http://images.qvc.com/is/image/j/61/j317961.001?$uslarge$" alt="Epiphany Diamonique 3.40 cttw Round Halo Stud Earrings" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 16:27:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217133#M67025</guid>
      <dc:creator>expatgal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-03T16:27:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Look Familiar?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217138#M67026</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is not the first time that a JR design has ended up over on the Epiphany side Ican't recall which pieces, but I've seen the "crossover" before)---I am sure that the Q has the copyright to the TSV design and can use it if and as they choose.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 17:04:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217138#M67026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Maxine49</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-03T17:04:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Look Familiar?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217143#M67027</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;this is even worse:&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt; &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.qvc.com/" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2014 18:47:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217143#M67027</guid>
      <dc:creator>BGDC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-03T18:47:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Look Familiar?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217148#M67028</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;What is the price of the versions with the Ripka name????&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 15:24:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217148#M67028</guid>
      <dc:creator>terrier3</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T15:24:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Look Familiar?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217152#M67029</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are definitely huge similarities. I would guess that the non-Ripka pieces are lighter weight (have less silver), and of course they don't have the Ripka texturing or finishing - so the production costs are lower for these pieces. It gives you a Ripka look. I like all of the texturing and weight of my Ripka pieces, but I suppose some people might prefer no texture.  I wouldn't be surprised if there were also differences in how the stones were set. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2014 16:41:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Look-Familiar/m-p/1217152#M67029</guid>
      <dc:creator>MizKringle</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-09-08T16:41:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

