<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why no size 5 rings? grrrr in Jewelry</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Why-no-size-5-rings-grrrr/m-p/35953#M3156</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I admit, I don't watch every jewelry show the Q offers up, but I do tend to BUY jewelry and I'm always frustrated that the Q seems to RARELY offer rings in size 5!  I'm a ring person and the bolder, the better.  They are showing J156713 right now (Sterling Turquoise White Agate).  If it were like the TSV ring before (the carved one with gold strips), I can get by with a 6 since it was recommended to size up - which I did and I love that ring.  SO many rings are top-heave as well (which again, I love), but that makes it even more important that the ring is not too big.  I cannot figure out why size 5 is excluded more often than not - dare I say 95% of the time.  Is it THAT small of a ring size?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>californiamomofthree</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-03-02T02:43:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why no size 5 rings? grrrr</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Why-no-size-5-rings-grrrr/m-p/35953#M3156</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I admit, I don't watch every jewelry show the Q offers up, but I do tend to BUY jewelry and I'm always frustrated that the Q seems to RARELY offer rings in size 5!  I'm a ring person and the bolder, the better.  They are showing J156713 right now (Sterling Turquoise White Agate).  If it were like the TSV ring before (the carved one with gold strips), I can get by with a 6 since it was recommended to size up - which I did and I love that ring.  SO many rings are top-heave as well (which again, I love), but that makes it even more important that the ring is not too big.  I cannot figure out why size 5 is excluded more often than not - dare I say 95% of the time.  Is it THAT small of a ring size?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Mar 2011 02:43:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Why-no-size-5-rings-grrrr/m-p/35953#M3156</guid>
      <dc:creator>californiamomofthree</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-03-02T02:43:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

