<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Beverly Hills Elegance in Jewelry</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Beverly-Hills-Elegance/m-p/272976#M19023</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;BHE is on today on ShopNBC. I know gold has become too expensive to use the heavy setting of the past, but I noticed that the daimond quality has gone way down as well. I have one ring bought years ago that has I1 quaility; it was relatively inexpensive because that was low quality for him at the time; he used mostly SI diamonds. Now they are I2-I3! Nothing I would even consider. (Not that I need any more rings or pendants, anyway!) I'd rather buy cz.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ilovegreengems</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-12-02T16:09:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Beverly Hills Elegance</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Beverly-Hills-Elegance/m-p/272976#M19023</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;BHE is on today on ShopNBC. I know gold has become too expensive to use the heavy setting of the past, but I noticed that the daimond quality has gone way down as well. I have one ring bought years ago that has I1 quaility; it was relatively inexpensive because that was low quality for him at the time; he used mostly SI diamonds. Now they are I2-I3! Nothing I would even consider. (Not that I need any more rings or pendants, anyway!) I'd rather buy cz.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 02 Dec 2012 16:09:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Jewelry/Beverly-Hills-Elegance/m-p/272976#M19023</guid>
      <dc:creator>ilovegreengems</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-12-02T16:09:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

