<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Boy watch ebay sellers, listing old as new etc.... in Shoes</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Shoes/Boy-watch-ebay-sellers-listing-old-as-new-etc/m-p/172237#M6227</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This seller originally had this listed as NEW 2012 version in bold in the title and has descriptions for both the new version and the old version in descript.  Pic is obviously the old version.   I wrote her and asked if it is new and this just isn't the correct pic  OR is this the old version and pic is of actual item.  She wrote back and got kind of nasty with me saying "I guess you can think whatever you want i took the pic myself and it is new version".    But I noticed she took the NEW wording out of the title , yet insists I am wrong and it IS the new version.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Does anyone else see the NEW version in this pic or have I gone insane ??&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/260975900053?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&amp;amp;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649" target="_blank"&gt; http://www.ebay.com/itm/260975900053?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&amp;amp;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>chocolate-rules-all</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-11T22:17:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Boy watch ebay sellers, listing old as new etc....</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Shoes/Boy-watch-ebay-sellers-listing-old-as-new-etc/m-p/172237#M6227</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This seller originally had this listed as NEW 2012 version in bold in the title and has descriptions for both the new version and the old version in descript.  Pic is obviously the old version.   I wrote her and asked if it is new and this just isn't the correct pic  OR is this the old version and pic is of actual item.  She wrote back and got kind of nasty with me saying "I guess you can think whatever you want i took the pic myself and it is new version".    But I noticed she took the NEW wording out of the title , yet insists I am wrong and it IS the new version.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Does anyone else see the NEW version in this pic or have I gone insane ??&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.ebay.com/itm/260975900053?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&amp;amp;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649" target="_blank"&gt; http://www.ebay.com/itm/260975900053?ssPageName=STRK:MEWAX:IT&amp;amp;_trksid=p3984.m1438.l2649&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2012 22:17:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Shoes/Boy-watch-ebay-sellers-listing-old-as-new-etc/m-p/172237#M6227</guid>
      <dc:creator>chocolate-rules-all</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-11T22:17:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

