https://community.qvc.com/t5/Shoes/Uh-uh-That-TSV-is-NOT-a-398-Dooney-bag/m-p/381268#M11242 <P>When Sue and Lisa unleashed the new bag last night, the mantra of the evening was how if bought at 'regular' retail the bag alone would be worth $398... Many of us know our Dooney's and I don't see this bag raking in the same bucks that a medium or large satchel or domed buckle satchel from the Dillen or Florentine lines would command. Am I the only one that finds this a bit of a stretch? The TSV is a nice bag, but I'm sorry, I don't personally think this bag would normally retail for that much. It seems QVC inflated that figure to make this bag appear to be a better deal than it is... not that it's a bad deal, it isn't, but that isn't a four hundred dollar bag, with or without the token accessories.</P> Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:00:44 GMT stevieb 2013-11-16T17:00:44Z https://community.qvc.com/t5/Shoes/Uh-uh-That-TSV-is-NOT-a-398-Dooney-bag/m-p/381268#M11242 <P>When Sue and Lisa unleashed the new bag last night, the mantra of the evening was how if bought at 'regular' retail the bag alone would be worth $398... Many of us know our Dooney's and I don't see this bag raking in the same bucks that a medium or large satchel or domed buckle satchel from the Dillen or Florentine lines would command. Am I the only one that finds this a bit of a stretch? The TSV is a nice bag, but I'm sorry, I don't personally think this bag would normally retail for that much. It seems QVC inflated that figure to make this bag appear to be a better deal than it is... not that it's a bad deal, it isn't, but that isn't a four hundred dollar bag, with or without the token accessories.</P> Sat, 16 Nov 2013 17:00:44 GMT https://community.qvc.com/t5/Shoes/Uh-uh-That-TSV-is-NOT-a-398-Dooney-bag/m-p/381268#M11242 stevieb 2013-11-16T17:00:44Z