<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Is Logo the new moo-moo ?? or large cascading things in Fashion</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/Is-Logo-the-new-moo-moo-or-large-cascading-things/m-p/344007#M25491</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi -- I happened to watch Kaitie Couric last week on dating segment and there was a woman critiquing dressing etc.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Basically all trapizee type tops and long cascading sweaters -- are now considered the new moo-moos   I have a couple of the high-low hem but seems like things are getting very volumunous on the Q lately even Issac??  Any comments??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>paulet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-07-29T21:36:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is Logo the new moo-moo ?? or large cascading things</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/Is-Logo-the-new-moo-moo-or-large-cascading-things/m-p/344007#M25491</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi -- I happened to watch Kaitie Couric last week on dating segment and there was a woman critiquing dressing etc.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Basically all trapizee type tops and long cascading sweaters -- are now considered the new moo-moos   I have a couple of the high-low hem but seems like things are getting very volumunous on the Q lately even Issac??  Any comments??&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 29 Jul 2013 21:36:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/Is-Logo-the-new-moo-moo-or-large-cascading-things/m-p/344007#M25491</guid>
      <dc:creator>paulet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-29T21:36:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

