<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Mis-shipped in Fashion</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/Mis-shipped/m-p/323924#M23585</link>
    <description>On May 8, a top I had bought shipped, according to the order status. Today, May 10, the status shows "mis-shipped." Not only do I not recall ever seeing that terminology in my order status before this, I wonder how they determined so quickly that it was sent to the wrong address. Have they become that efficient in noting mistakes?</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 16:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>StuffnSuch</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-05-10T16:59:21Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Mis-shipped</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/Mis-shipped/m-p/323924#M23585</link>
      <description>On May 8, a top I had bought shipped, according to the order status. Today, May 10, the status shows "mis-shipped." Not only do I not recall ever seeing that terminology in my order status before this, I wonder how they determined so quickly that it was sent to the wrong address. Have they become that efficient in noting mistakes?</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 May 2013 16:59:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/Mis-shipped/m-p/323924#M23585</guid>
      <dc:creator>StuffnSuch</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-05-10T16:59:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

