<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic WK Item Numbers in Fashion</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/WK-Item-Numbers/m-p/311092#M22275</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Getting a little nervous about correct item numbers for the upcoming Whisper Knit goodies.  So anxious to get it right.  Back before Hurricane Sandy, the item # for the WK Kimono Sweater was #A229721.  I was going to order it in Walnut -- but "Mother Nature" had other ideas for all of us.  Now this Spring the item # is A233950.  Seems to be the same sweater, but I'm a little leary.  Now the matching vneck item # is #A223942.  Usually when new mulitiple items of the same category are introduced, they begin with the same 3 numbers (like 233 for all).  This new vneck is one number off -- I'm wondering if it should be 233, not 223.  Maybe the number of the next WK item will tell us more.  What are your thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>QBH</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-03-22T14:42:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>WK Item Numbers</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/WK-Item-Numbers/m-p/311092#M22275</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Getting a little nervous about correct item numbers for the upcoming Whisper Knit goodies.  So anxious to get it right.  Back before Hurricane Sandy, the item # for the WK Kimono Sweater was #A229721.  I was going to order it in Walnut -- but "Mother Nature" had other ideas for all of us.  Now this Spring the item # is A233950.  Seems to be the same sweater, but I'm a little leary.  Now the matching vneck item # is #A223942.  Usually when new mulitiple items of the same category are introduced, they begin with the same 3 numbers (like 233 for all).  This new vneck is one number off -- I'm wondering if it should be 233, not 223.  Maybe the number of the next WK item will tell us more.  What are your thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Mar 2013 14:42:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Fashion/WK-Item-Numbers/m-p/311092#M22275</guid>
      <dc:creator>QBH</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-03-22T14:42:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

