topic Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive in Fashion

LOGO seems to be more expensive

QVCPhobe — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:47:20 GMT

I was looking at the LOGO tanks and they seem to have increased over last year. One tank last year was about $29.00 and now it is about $34.00. Many of her pieces seem more expensive. What do you think?

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Mtnbikegirl — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 05:55:31 GMT

Her rayon/span fabric is worth it to me. I just received a similar style top in cotton/span, and it just doesn't feel as nice. LOGO drapes so nicely. It's a little more expensive, but it's worth it to me. I am slowly building a nice collection. The rayon/span is my favorite fabric to wear- SO SOFT...

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Whippit — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 09:16:49 GMT

Her Items are very expensive & they wrinkle Easley .....Susan Gravers Items are getting very high too...$45.00 for a tank top!! I don't think so...I do love her designer though!...

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

winamac1 — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 12:48:54 GMT

On 2/9/2015 Mtnbikegirl said:
Her rayon/span fabric is worth it to me. I just received a similar style top in cotton/span, and it just doesn't feel as nice. LOGO drapes so nicely. It's a little more expensive, but it's worth it to me. I am slowly building a nice collection. The rayon/span is my favorite fabric to wear- SO SOFT...

I like a lot of her items, and they do drape far nicer than other "off brands". Every time I see a Logo-style top at other retail stores that are less expensive, they just don't fit the same, they are shorter, and they don't drape well. That being said, Logo prices are becoming very high. I am noticing her bringing in more and more tops close to $70. With s/h and tax, they can be almost $80. I am looking for fewer rayon/spandex ones as I have many in my closet already. I'm looking for more cotton/modal blends now. I saw one yesterday that I liked in the product review, but it sold out. I do think it was rayon/spandex, but it was a gorgeous print.

Boutique-style tops that are a bit similar are more expensive, but I'd not really be buying them either right now. I'm focusing on a few Logo if it's the right blend and more lululemon as I seem to wear those items when I'm not working. I have enough work clothes to last me 10 lifetimes, LOL.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

va603 — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:10:48 GMT

I agree, but have also seen an increase in clothing prices across the board. It seems like it's everywhere, not just QVC. I have read the price of cotton, for instance, is at an all time high. I wonder if the price of manufacturing is going up too? Logo is easily my favorite brand on QVC. I'm still buying, but I definitely think twice before hitting the speed buy button.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

mercyMe — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 17:20:12 GMT

Agree!

Logo Layers $$$ have skyrocketed. I wanted another tank (have 2 @ $29 ea.), but will not pay the higher price for the same garment! Just purchased a cardigan (lounge wear fabric) and the quality wasn't up-to-par as another style I purchased. Sadly, I think my LOGO days are coming to an end .... but I love to watch her shows.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Kathlen — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:39:06 GMT

I just bought a LOGO top and a cardigan - each under $60. A similar rayon top at Soft Surroundings is $89 and has better color choices. No similar cardigans ... but a rayon cardigan, solid color, with fringe is $125 at SS. But SS has higher shipping.

A similar cardigan at Chico's is $109 and a similar rayon top is $69 - I get free Passport Shipping and I have coupons.

So - for me, the prices aren't out of line.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

so so — Tue, 10 Feb 2015 18:44:48 GMT

LOGO is one saggy, baggy, sloppy mess.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

grumpycat — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:42:36 GMT

I think the price is okay compared to what I've seen at retail outlets. The issue I have with LOGO is that everything is so boring and frumpy looking.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

fthunt — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 17:48:52 GMT

Christine said it....................Perfectly! LOL

(looks like rags)

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

katiescarlett — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:22:45 GMT

Sorry, I just don't "get" her clothes. Everything has an uneven hem!

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Kathlen — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 18:53:05 GMT

On 2/11/2015 grumpycat said:
I think the price is okay compared to what I've seen at retail outlets. The issue I have with LOGO is that everything is so boring and frumpy looking.

It can be boring if you don't style it ... personalize it.

IMHO -frumpy happens when someone doesn't have any personal style.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

LilacTree — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 19:19:50 GMT

It's their new S&H policy ($3.00). They are simply raising the price of the product to make up for it. And doing away with a couple of former policies to the customer's detriment.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

winamac1 — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:34:26 GMT

On 2/11/2015 Ford1224 said:
It's their new S&H policy ($3.00). They are simply raising the price of the product to make up for it. And doing away with a couple of former policies to the customer's detriment.

Ita! Exactly

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

hopi — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 21:46:45 GMT

On 2/9/2015 QVCPhobe said:
I was looking at the LOGO tanks and they seem to have increased over last year. One tank last year was about $29.00 and now it is about $34.00. Many of her pieces seem more expensive. What do you think?

I think those tops are in Kohls, Walmarts, Carson with much better fabrics and cheaper.

Q has raised it's prices on everything, it's all about profit with Q now not quality.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

febe1 — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:53:35 GMT

On 2/11/2015 fthunt said:
Christine said it....................Perfectly! LOL

(looks like rags)

Looks like they would be good ones for my bag-o-rags, soft and easy dust pick up. Noticed Kate&Mallory had them on sale today for $l9.99. Had the chiffon running down the back. The chiffon wouldn't be good for dusting.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

febe1 — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 22:58:00 GMT

The Q has raised prices & significantly. Pants that sold forever for $29., and with S&H plus tax was $39. Now, the price is $39. on all their pants. Susan Graver has increased substantially. With Susan, it's supply & demand; maybe so with D&Co. Denim & Co. is no real value anymore, just competitive with everyone else. Same with Susan. You pay for convenience here. Sometimes I will, and sometimes I won't. I used to think quality, value and convenience were all with the Q.

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

gojo — Wed, 11 Feb 2015 23:05:11 GMT

Yes, LOGO prices have gone up - Monday night there was a tank, a Hot Pick on buy more and save $5 - well the tank in the video was a regular QVC price of $32 - it was now a regular QVC price of $37 - so they weren't giving you anything with the buy more and save - they were making $5. Also, with the new shipping policy - that is not good for the customer. I received 4 lunchtime special LOGO tops - not so great - I would have normally returned them but I would lose the original shipping of $12 and another $7 to send back - so that's $19 I'd lose. Crazy. Will definitely be cutting down on my shopping here!

Re: LOGO seems to be more expensive

Mtnbikegirl — Thu, 12 Feb 2015 01:45:39 GMT

Being that LOGO is getting it's own show, I think the money is coming in for this line. Whomever, feels differently, I believe QVC doesn't care, since you are the minority.