topic Re: LOGO? in Fashion

LOGO?

nyfd380 — Fri, 16 May 2014 22:38:43 GMT

Hello my fellow QVCers,

Can anyone tell me what demographic is wearing LOGO? I don't get it! I have been a QVCer for more than twenty years and this is the first line of clothing that I just don't get! I am so surprised that this line is still being presented. Maybe I am just too because I don't see anything appealing about this line of clothing. Can some one please help me out here?

Thanks

Re: LOGO?

NanaS — Fri, 16 May 2014 23:22:35 GMT

LOGO has never appealed to me .....I don't like anything you need to layer and layer. It ends up looking really frumpy. Im sorry but I don't think a woman her age even looks appropriate in those clothes. I did order one t shirt when she began on QVC and it was sooooo thin and $$$$ and showed every bump . I am an XL.....sent it back and never ordered again.

Re: LOGO?

Kathlen — Fri, 16 May 2014 23:27:54 GMT

I can relate. (I feel that way about some of the other QVC clothing lines.)

I love LOGO. Have about a dozen pieces.

I live in an apartment in Manhattan - in my early 70s. It's a popular look around here.

Re: LOGO?

sarpy — Fri, 16 May 2014 23:29:39 GMT

I can't figure it out either.

Re: LOGO?

SunshineK — Fri, 16 May 2014 23:35:31 GMT

I like LOGO a lot. I don't layer it like Lori, but I will wear one piece of LOGO mixed with other clothes.I just got the vest with the chiffon trim and I love it! I am in my early 50's and I live in South Florida. Oh, and just for demographic purposes I wear a xxs in Logo.

Re: LOGO?

AT — Sat, 17 May 2014 00:20:20 GMT

I liked the initial pieces of LOGO, but not now. The material is so thin that if anything is hanging against it in the closet, it is a wrinkled mess. I think Lori is probably a very nice person, but to me she oftentimes looks like a bag lady that has found clothing in different dumpsters. Like so many modern fashions, if you are model thin you look great, but these are not for the plus sizes!! The price is also a major concern for me, as a simple top usually costs $50 plus with shipping. Unless she changes her line I won't be buying her clothing again.

Re: LOGO?

foundinlv — Sat, 17 May 2014 00:27:10 GMT

I don't like the flared out material at the hip and I don't like the pockets that look like there's something in there pulling it down...looks sloppy. But, the fabric feels good and is nice for the summer. When Lori makes one for all body types minus the pockets....I'll buy one.

Re: LOGO?

snappyfrappy — Sat, 17 May 2014 00:27:41 GMT

I have a few of her tops, but not with pockets on the hips and thighs! Please!

Re: LOGO?

Desertdi — Sat, 17 May 2014 00:52:17 GMT

It's 100 here today..........saw a woman out shopping, wearing a "logo-type" sharkbite top.....that's it......NO tights.....NO pants..........nada. She was barely legal...........good thing it wasn't windy today.

Re: LOGO?

bbluvr — Sat, 17 May 2014 00:57:23 GMT

Me. I am 5'5" tall, 50 years old and in decent shape. I like the look. It is artsy and free spirited.

So there you go. Now you know.

Re: LOGO?

ZinnaV — Sat, 17 May 2014 08:56:48 GMT

I saw part of a LOGO show a couple of months ago and the Scooby Do character Velma immediately came to mind when I saw Lori. The multiple layers of clothes worn together doesn't appeal to me. To me it looks as if one was putting on as many pieces of clothes as possible in preparation for the impending fashion apocalypse.

Re: LOGO?

TriciatheRealtor — Sat, 17 May 2014 09:04:56 GMT

Love LOGO clothes. Especially the cardigans and vests. I do admit to struggling with sizing sometimes, because I don't want things to look too baggy. And, I love the pockets - and in fact, I almost consider that a must when purchasing her clothes!

If you haven't looked at and/or considered it, I highly recommend her semi-maxi dress that comes in two colors I think - black and cranberry -- if I am remembering right. I bought the black. It's a high/low but not drastic. It's a simple black sheath-style dress with a scoop neck AND pockets. I'm living in it. Not just to wear out, but to wear around the house. It's devine, especially the fabric which has Modal in it so it's thicker than most of her other clothes.

Anyway as far as demo, I'm 54 and live in the South (but grew up in Northeast).

Re: LOGO?

Kathlen — Sat, 17 May 2014 13:23:17 GMT

On 5/16/2014 ILikeShade said:
I don't like the flared out material at the hip and I don't like the pockets that look like there's something in there pulling it down...looks sloppy. But, the fabric feels good and is nice for the summer. When Lori makes one for all body types minus the pockets....I'll buy one.

I tend to agree that for some body types - that's not a good look.

But for me and my body, LOGO is great!

Re: LOGO?

brii — Sat, 17 May 2014 13:25:45 GMT

I'm 5' 9"" and have a few pieces of LOGO.

I don't like the vests at all or wear all the layering she does. I love the chiffon trim.

I think having a few pieces is okay. I wouldn't want a whole closet full of them.

Re: LOGO?

EmmasMom — Sat, 17 May 2014 13:35:12 GMT

I don't care for the layered look at all. Granted, it looked O.K. on the tall, slender models, but I thought it was terribly unflattering on Jane Treacy. My preference runs more to the classic styles that will be around for a while.

Re: LOGO?

Biftu — Sat, 17 May 2014 13:38:19 GMT

What is so confusing? I agree, it is an artsy free-spirited look that is so comfortable. I don't mix all the colors like Lori does, but most times keep it simple and more monochromatic. You can create your own individual look. I can mix and match pieces, roll them in my suitcase and have multiple looks for a week away in a carry on bag. I also love all her pants, they are the best. I am a petite senior (xxs) and love this look.

Re: LOGO?

winamac1 — Sat, 17 May 2014 13:55:27 GMT

I do.

I'm five 8 and slender. I am not too many years away from menopause. That's the demographic I am.

Re: LOGO?

Peaches McPhee — Sat, 17 May 2014 14:08:16 GMT

On 5/16/2014 bbluvr said:
It is artsy and free spirited.

This is very well said. It is artsy. I love the unstructured look about it.

As with everything, it is not for everyone. So, why do people think it should be? That is what I don't get.

Re: LOGO?

Perkup — Sat, 17 May 2014 14:17:06 GMT

For me, it's LOGO, NOGO!!

I'm almost 80, but that's not the problem. I'm also short - about 5'1" on a good day. Logo might look "acceptable" on a tall, slim person, but not on a shortie like me. And honestly, I think it's a really cheap look. Like you got your clothing at a thrift store & nothing really fits.

I thought it looked awful on Jane Treach and Mary Beth. It's not for me under any circumstances.

Re: LOGO?

chrystaltree — Sat, 17 May 2014 14:23:02 GMT

I'm pretty sure the LOGO demographic is women who like that style. It's everywhere and has been for several years. Don't pretend you haven't seen it in malls and stores. If you don't like it, don't wear it. And don't watch Lori' s shows. I have several tops, I like the casual, artsy feel and they work well with bold jewelry.