<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Weight and taxes in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Weight-and-taxes/m-p/2057#M573</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="messageBody"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"The death tax is rising from 0% to 35%, yet is being called a “tax cut” because it could have been 55%. So, if I gain 35 pounds, but I could have gained 55, is it a 20 pound loss?"  - Stu Burguiere&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:40:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Melliezap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-11T04:40:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weight and taxes</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Weight-and-taxes/m-p/2057#M573</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class="messageBody"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;"The death tax is rising from 0% to 35%, yet is being called a “tax cut” because it could have been 55%. So, if I gain 35 pounds, but I could have gained 55, is it a 20 pound loss?"  - Stu Burguiere&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Dec 2010 04:40:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Weight-and-taxes/m-p/2057#M573</guid>
      <dc:creator>Melliezap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-11T04:40:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

