<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Divorce Ring....What Next? in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Divorce-Ring-What-Next/m-p/111329#M52209</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I was reading on the net that a jeweler has come out with a divorce ring...heart shaped with a dagger of diamonds splitting the heart in two.  There were some other versions of divorce rings too (incomplete circle, etc.).  Gee...why don't we have a "single and looking" ring, an "in a relationship", and a "swingers' ring".  There are probably many other possibilities. Would you wear a divorce ring?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Yardlie</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-03T16:46:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Divorce Ring....What Next?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Divorce-Ring-What-Next/m-p/111329#M52209</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I was reading on the net that a jeweler has come out with a divorce ring...heart shaped with a dagger of diamonds splitting the heart in two.  There were some other versions of divorce rings too (incomplete circle, etc.).  Gee...why don't we have a "single and looking" ring, an "in a relationship", and a "swingers' ring".  There are probably many other possibilities. Would you wear a divorce ring?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 03 Sep 2011 16:46:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Divorce-Ring-What-Next/m-p/111329#M52209</guid>
      <dc:creator>Yardlie</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-03T16:46:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

