<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Juries in the future in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Juries-in-the-future/m-p/94883#M47429</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a feeling this case and all the discussion in the media will be around for a long time.  I think this jury will be compared in cases to come and compared to other juries. &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;I also wonder if anything will change as far as explanation to juries before deliberation.  I learned a lot listening to the criminologists and lawyers on the nightly discussions.  Do you think this will affect future juries and their decisions about how to listen to a case and realize that not all cases have a confession, a body or a murder weapon recovered, but only overwhelming circumstantial evidence to be considered?&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Yes, Casey got her constitutional right to a fair trial.  Justice was served for her.  For Caylee, there was no justice.  I hope I am making some sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:29:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>wildcherry</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-07-09T20:29:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Juries in the future</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Juries-in-the-future/m-p/94883#M47429</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I have a feeling this case and all the discussion in the media will be around for a long time.  I think this jury will be compared in cases to come and compared to other juries. &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;I also wonder if anything will change as far as explanation to juries before deliberation.  I learned a lot listening to the criminologists and lawyers on the nightly discussions.  Do you think this will affect future juries and their decisions about how to listen to a case and realize that not all cases have a confession, a body or a murder weapon recovered, but only overwhelming circumstantial evidence to be considered?&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Yes, Casey got her constitutional right to a fair trial.  Justice was served for her.  For Caylee, there was no justice.  I hope I am making some sense.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Jul 2011 20:29:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Juries-in-the-future/m-p/94883#M47429</guid>
      <dc:creator>wildcherry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-07-09T20:29:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

