<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Paging Calendula in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Paging-Calendula/m-p/1543#M441</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;As I was saying before it was poofed (interestingly enough...) RM tackles many issues, she just doesn't fit them all into one segment.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Here you go:&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Recently, Rachel Maddow picked up on &lt;A href="http://www.openleft.com/diary/15912/business-aims-to-relax-bans-on-products-made-with-child-and-slave-labor" target="_blank"&gt;an article written by David Sirota&lt;/A&gt; about how business groups are lobbying against provisions in a customs bill that contains provisions banning the importation of goods produced by convict labor, forced labor or forced or indentured child labor.  Check out the video below (and there's a &lt;A href="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/143891/rachel_maddow:_trying_to_skirt_work_laws,_corporations_are_" child_labor-endorsing="" target="_blank"&gt;transcript here&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2009/11/rachel-maddow-takes-on-corporations-defending-child-and-forced-labor.html" href="http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2009/11/rachel-maddow-takes-on-corporations-defending-child-and-forced-labor.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2009/11/rachel-maddow-takes-on-corporations-defending-child-and-forced-labor.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Is her taking on child labor enough for you?  Or do you still think she has an agenda to only report news about one thing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>equestrianesse</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-10T02:49:29Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Paging Calendula</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Paging-Calendula/m-p/1543#M441</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;As I was saying before it was poofed (interestingly enough...) RM tackles many issues, she just doesn't fit them all into one segment.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Here you go:&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Recently, Rachel Maddow picked up on &lt;A href="http://www.openleft.com/diary/15912/business-aims-to-relax-bans-on-products-made-with-child-and-slave-labor" target="_blank"&gt;an article written by David Sirota&lt;/A&gt; about how business groups are lobbying against provisions in a customs bill that contains provisions banning the importation of goods produced by convict labor, forced labor or forced or indentured child labor.  Check out the video below (and there's a &lt;A href="http://www.alternet.org/workplace/143891/rachel_maddow:_trying_to_skirt_work_laws,_corporations_are_" child_labor-endorsing="" target="_blank"&gt;transcript here&lt;/A&gt;).&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;&lt;A title="http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2009/11/rachel-maddow-takes-on-corporations-defending-child-and-forced-labor.html" href="http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2009/11/rachel-maddow-takes-on-corporations-defending-child-and-forced-labor.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://laborrightsblog.typepad.com/international_labor_right/2009/11/rachel-maddow-takes-on-corporations-defending-child-and-forced-labor.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Is her taking on child labor enough for you?  Or do you still think she has an agenda to only report news about one thing?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 02:49:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Paging-Calendula/m-p/1543#M441</guid>
      <dc:creator>equestrianesse</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-10T02:49:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

