<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Magic-jack versus Basic Talk in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Magic-jack-versus-Basic-Talk/m-p/928093#M360556</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have tried them which do you prefer and why? Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 02:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Passion Flower</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-06-03T02:07:49Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Magic-jack versus Basic Talk</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Magic-jack-versus-Basic-Talk/m-p/928093#M360556</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you have tried them which do you prefer and why? Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 02:07:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Magic-jack-versus-Basic-Talk/m-p/928093#M360556</guid>
      <dc:creator>Passion Flower</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-03T02:07:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Magic-jack versus Basic Talk</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Magic-jack-versus-Basic-Talk/m-p/928098#M360559</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The reviews I read show more are dissatisfied with magic jack than basic talk.  I just purchased basic talk for our vacation place but have not been there yet to connect it.  A relative has magic jack and it often disconnects in the middle of a call.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2014 03:30:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Magic-jack-versus-Basic-Talk/m-p/928098#M360559</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pook</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-06-03T03:30:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

