<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic 100 percent? in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/100-percent/m-p/8241#M3080</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Would you agree with a person's estate being taxed 100% upon death?  The reason....the children (or whoever is the heir) didn't earn that money, so why should they get it?  All money should go to the government.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;What do you think?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Melliezap</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-12-28T18:30:08Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>100 percent?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/100-percent/m-p/8241#M3080</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Would you agree with a person's estate being taxed 100% upon death?  The reason....the children (or whoever is the heir) didn't earn that money, so why should they get it?  All money should go to the government.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;What do you think?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2010 18:30:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/100-percent/m-p/8241#M3080</guid>
      <dc:creator>Melliezap</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-12-28T18:30:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

