topic Re: She's At It Again! in Community Chat

She's At It Again!

JaneMarple — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:47:01 GMT

Rachel from NJ went on a facebook rant against her parent's generation, making digs about suburban dwellers. This girl needs help, quick, fast and in a hurry!

Re: She's At It Again!

esmerelda — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:49:56 GMT

are you two friends on FB?

Re: She's At It Again!

straykatz — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:51:33 GMT

It's all over the internet news

http://nypost.com/2014/03/07/teen-suing-parents-baby-boomers-are-the-spoiled-ones/

Re: She's At It Again!

JaneMarple — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:51:51 GMT

On 3/7/2014 esmerelda said:
are you two friends on FB?

I just read it in a newspaper.

Re: She's At It Again!

mgm2 — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:51:55 GMT

Wow..just wow.

The judge is not going to like this..

Kinda reminds me of the teen in Florida who first cause her father to lose is job, he sued and won $80,000, he was told to keep it hush hush, she blabs about it on facebook, and he loses the money. He has a very slim chance of getting the money on appeal.

Re: She's At It Again!

esmerelda — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:55:38 GMT

On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
Wow..just wow.

The judge is not going to like this..

Kinda reminds me of the teen in Florida who first cause her father to lose is job, he sued and won $80,000, he was told to keep it hush hush, she blabs about it on facebook, and he loses the money. He has a very slim chance of getting the money on appeal.

Isn't she "not right"? Hopefully the dad will get it back.

Re: She's At It Again!

mgm2 — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:57:09 GMT

On 3/7/2014 esmerelda said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
Wow..just wow.

The judge is not going to like this..

Kinda reminds me of the teen in Florida who first cause her father to lose is job, he sued and won $80,000, he was told to keep it hush hush, she blabs about it on facebook, and he loses the money. He has a very slim chance of getting the money on appeal.

Isn't she "not right"? Hopefully the dad will get it back.

I don't understand this..

Re: She's At It Again!

pinkskates4 — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:58:18 GMT

On 3/7/2014 esmerelda said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
Wow..just wow.

The judge is not going to like this..

Kinda reminds me of the teen in Florida who first cause her father to lose is job, he sued and won $80,000, he was told to keep it hush hush, she blabs about it on facebook, and he loses the money. He has a very slim chance of getting the money on appeal.

Isn't she "not right"? Hopefully the dad will get it back.

I don't know. But if she isn't right, then that's all the more reason her father never should have told her.

The confidentiality agreement was his, not hers. He violated it when he told her. Now it's true if she hadn't done what she did, no one would have known he told her. But alas, that's not what happened.

I don't see him getting the money back.

Re: She's At It Again!

loveschocolate — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 21:59:40 GMT

Spoiled brat!

Re: She's At It Again!

esmerelda — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:02:01 GMT

On 3/7/2014 Dagna said:
On 3/7/2014 esmerelda said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
Wow..just wow.

The judge is not going to like this..

Kinda reminds me of the teen in Florida who first cause her father to lose is job, he sued and won $80,000, he was told to keep it hush hush, she blabs about it on facebook, and he loses the money. He has a very slim chance of getting the money on appeal.

Isn't she "not right"? Hopefully the dad will get it back.

I don't know. But if she isn't right, then that's all the more reason her father never should have told her.

The confidentiality agreement was his, not hers. He violated it when he told her. Now it's true if she hadn't done what she did, no one would have known he told her. But alas, that's not what happened.

I don't see him getting the money back.

Did he actually tell her, e.g., "Sally, daddy got a lot of money" or is it the case that she heard him and his wife discussing it?

Re: She's At It Again!

Yuban3 — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:02:12 GMT

Today's youth put everything out there for the whole world to see, not understanding the consequences of doing so.

Re: She's At It Again!

loveschocolate — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:03:22 GMT

She needs to get a job! She blew it with her parents once she moved out. She could go back home if she follows the rules. She chooses not too. I would LOVE for her to join the military! She wouldn't make it thru basic training!!!

Re: She's At It Again!

serenity4ever — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:03:33 GMT

“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. It is Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

Re: She's At It Again!

JaneMarple — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:07:40 GMT

On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. It is Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The nydailynews.com and the nypost.com have posted straight from her facebook page.

Re: She's At It Again!

mgm2 — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:08:06 GMT

On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. Is it Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The post appeared on the “Education for Rachel”Facebook page, which Canning previously told The Post she set up to support her cause.

Re: She's At It Again!

serenity4ever — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:08:58 GMT

On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. Is it Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The post appeared on the “Education for Rachel”Facebook page, which Canning previously told The Post she set up to support her cause.

Yes but we don't know if she was the person who conveyed the message. It could have been one of her supporters and not Rachael posting it.

Re: She's At It Again!

mgm2 — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:11:57 GMT

On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. Is it Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The post appeared on the “Education for Rachel”Facebook page, which Canning previously told The Post she set up to support her cause.

Yes but we don't know if she was the person who conveyed the message. It could have been one of her supporters and not Rachael posting it.

Yes, it cold have been. If it wasn't Rachel, she's had ample time since 7:00 a.m. to go on the page, post that it's not her and ask supporters not to post such messages because it can hinder her case.

Re: She's At It Again!

JaneMarple — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:14:32 GMT

On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. Is it Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The post appeared on the “Education for Rachel”Facebook page, which Canning previously told The Post she set up to support her cause.

Yes but we don't know if she was the person who conveyed the message. It could have been one of her supporters and not Rachael posting it.

Yes, it cold have been. If it wasn't Rachel, she's had ample time since 7:00 a.m. to go on the page, post that it's not her and ask supporters not to post such messages because it can hinder her case.

ITA

Re: She's At It Again!

serenity4ever — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:15:32 GMT

On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. Is it Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The post appeared on the “Education for Rachel”Facebook page, which Canning previously told The Post she set up to support her cause.

Yes but we don't know if she was the person who conveyed the message. It could have been one of her supporters and not Rachael posting it.

Yes, it cold have been. If it wasn't Rachel, she's had ample time since 7:00 a.m. to go on the page, post that it's not her and ask supporters not to post such messages because it can hinder her case.

In New Jersey (as in most states) parents are required to support their kids through high school unless legally emancipated, which I'm not. This means that they can NOT put conditions on me being at home, which they did. They can't get out of this. The fact that they cut my tuition was also clear bad faith, and a breach of contract with the school. What did they expect me to do, drop out? I am absolutely amazed at some of the cruel (and legally ignorant) comments I'm reading here.

Rachael's post

__________________

OK, I think someone is manipulating Rachael and feeding her a lot of BS and I suspect it is that attorney that has a gripe with her father. She is naive and stupid and sadly, if she isn't telling the truth about her mother and father, this will hang over her for the rest of her life. It will affect her employment in the future and chances at college. It is the most pathetic case of an attorney manipulating a young person, I have ever witnessed. It gives a bad name to those practicing law in a decent way.....

Re: She's At It Again!

JaneMarple — Fri, 07 Mar 2014 22:17:23 GMT

On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
On 3/7/2014 mgm2 said:
On 3/7/2014 serenity4ever said:
“I have been stunned by the financial greed of modern parents who are more concerned with retiring into some fantasy world rather than provide for their children’s college and young adult years,” a poster — presumed to be Morris Catholic HS senior Rachel Canning or a supporter — wrote in the pre-dawn web screed.

Emphasis on PRESUMED. Is it Rachael who posted this. I would like some proof that it is. Or is it just someone adding fuel to the fire.

The post appeared on the “Education for Rachel”Facebook page, which Canning previously told The Post she set up to support her cause.

Yes but we don't know if she was the person who conveyed the message. It could have been one of her supporters and not Rachael posting it.

Yes, it cold have been. If it wasn't Rachel, she's had ample time since 7:00 a.m. to go on the page, post that it's not her and ask supporters not to post such messages because it can hinder her case.

In New Jersey (as in most states) parents are required to support their kids through high school unless legally emancipated, which I'm not. This means that they can NOT put conditions on me being at home, which they did. They can't get out of this. The fact that they cut my tuition was also clear bad faith, and a breach of contract with the school. What did they expect me to do, drop out? I am absolutely amazed at some of the cruel (and legally ignorant) comments I'm reading here.

Rachael's post

__________________

OK, I think someone is manipulating Rachael and feeding her a lot of BS and I suspect it is that attorney that has a gripe with her father. She is naive and stupid and sadly, if she isn't telling the truth about her mother and father, this will hang over her for the rest of her life. It will affect her employment in the future and chances at college. It is the most pathetic case of an attorney manipulating a young person, I have ever witnessed. It gives a bad name to those practicing law in a decent way.....

ITA with your entire post.