<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Anyone Dabbling in AI? in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Anyone-Dabbling-in-AI/m-p/8598761#M2077526</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;That's very taboo in the creative community so we are all making a decision to either use it sparingly or not at all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Those I hang with have mainly decided no for the simple reason that in a lot of cases it violates our copyrights which we've paid to have and legally own as well as the ongoing danger to putting all human creativity out of business.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For creatives like writers, musicians, and visual/graphic artists, it's going to overtake us at some point. We're not blind to it. There is an ongoing lawsuit among writers concerning our copyrights in the courts right now.&amp;nbsp;The art community has been particularly hard hit during this first wave.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Writers are battling AI along with Amazon who, to date, has been a fairly solid ally with us in trying to differentiate human written novels from AI generated ones for you the consumer most of all.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Books must be checked now when you publish via KDP if they are AI generated or not and there's hope that Amazon can tighten that even further for those who lie.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The AI books, which come primarily from Asia, are slick about pirating our work both in fiction and nonfiction. They are not being clear that it's not us but an AI generated version of us. It's easy to get the blame for a bad book when people think they are buying our work and then end up getting an AI version instead.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It's a tricky balance and I hope they get it right sooner rather than later. For those of us who have our livelihood really threatened by this, it would be nice to have some common sense laws like they did with Napster and music downloads before it gets too bad.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;AI is here to stay, but there should be strong boundaries or crystal clear labeling for art in all its forms which is not human inspired, but computer generated instead.&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Sep 2024 17:54:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Laura14</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-09-23T17:54:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Anyone Dabbling in AI?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Anyone-Dabbling-in-AI/m-p/8597775#M2077397</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I watched a lengthy video last night.&amp;nbsp; I may have to wait till it gets a little more simplified/automated.&amp;nbsp; I can see that happening pretty soon.&amp;nbsp; Oh, I'll look to see if Photoshop is using it yet.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 22 Sep 2024 19:50:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Anyone-Dabbling-in-AI/m-p/8597775#M2077397</guid>
      <dc:creator>monicakm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-09-22T19:50:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

