topic Re: TSV complaints in Community Chat

TSV complaints

Group 5 minus 1 — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 16:36:24 GMT

Finally saw the pic of Kim modeling. Do not know why some were offended. Many people need the large sizes and I think she looked great!

Could not find the message-sorry.

Re: TSV complaints

Travone — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:14:17 GMT

I think the message was deleted for some reason.

Re: TSV complaints

Imaoldhippie — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:15:29 GMT

I find it odd people are complaining about a fully clothed picture of a tush. No complaints when they have models in bras and panties.

Re: TSV complaints

Krimpette — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:32:25 GMT

From my point of view, it's the 'in your face' tush picture that I find tacky. Fine to show form fitting clothing, but that photo just "hits' you in the face on the home age. To each their own. JMHO.

Re: TSV complaints

mom2four0418 — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:35:52 GMT

@Imaoldhippie wrote:
I find it odd people are complaining about a fully clothed picture of a tush. No complaints when they have models in bras and panties.

I wonder if the negative reaction would have been the same if she was a size 2.

Re: TSV complaints

chrystaltree — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:40:38 GMT

There are people on this board who are afraid of butts......

Re: TSV complaints

Krimpette — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:09:50 GMT

@mom2four0418 Even if it was a size 2, if it was such a close up in such a pose, I would still find it tacky. JMHO.

Re: TSV complaints

lulu1 — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:46:00 GMT

I have no fear of butts. I do not care whose derriere it is. I think it's tacky, one of the largest pictures on the homepage is an "in your face butt".

Can you imagine what would be said if any other vendor (Susan Graver to name one) was pictured in a similar pose?

Re: TSV complaints

cherry — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:48:25 GMT

@lulu1 consider the source

Re: TSV complaints

proudlyfromNJ — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:52:56 GMT

I’d like to know who decided to put the picture up there.

Re: TSV complaints

grooms — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 17:58:56 GMT

I so totally agree. I have nothing against butts but I do find it horribly offensive to turn on QVC first thing in the morning and having this butt close up staring me in the face.....this close up is not an attractive picture of a butt - especially screetching KG. Show some class QVC!

Re: TSV complaints

RainyDayGal — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:10:41 GMT

@mom2four0418 wrote:
@Imaoldhippie wrote:
I find it odd people are complaining about a fully clothed picture of a tush. No complaints when they have models in bras and panties.
I wonder if the negative reaction would have been the same if she was a size 2.

So true on both counts! I think the photo is fine (it is showing the back and pockets), and she looks good. Of all the things to find "disturbing".

Re: TSV complaints

tansy — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:22:11 GMT

Some of you must have a very large monitor:/

Re: TSV complaints

Trinity11 — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:28:06 GMT

It is bad enough that Kim is in your face when she is on air, now we have to be treated to a photo of her in your face butt. Enough already!

Re: TSV complaints

Ms tyrion2 — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:29:46 GMT

@tansy wrote:
Some of you must have a very large monitor:/

😂🤣😁😄

Re: TSV complaints

SahmIam — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:31:35 GMT

Being real....I thought the purpose of the tush picture was to show:

1) The back pocket detail

2) The waistband detail

3) How smooth it will look meaning no panty line.

Personally, I appreciated it because you can't see that from a distant or non back shot.

Re: TSV complaints

cherry — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:34:08 GMT

@Trinity11 you nailed it

Re: TSV complaints

Tinkrbl44 — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:42:26 GMT

Generally speaking, I'm not crazy about any photo where a woman wears something tight ..... and looks like a stuffed sausage. It IS tacky. JMO.

Re: TSV complaints

Pook — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:52:09 GMT

But yet when a rear picture of the Spanx jeans there were no complaints!!!

Re: TSV complaints

Alison Wonderland — Mon, 07 Oct 2019 18:59:55 GMT

@SahmIam wrote:
Being real....I thought the purpose of the tush picture was to show:

1) The back pocket detail

2) The waistband detail

3) How smooth it will look meaning no panty line.

Personally, I appreciated it because you can't see that from a distant or non back shot.

Agreed. It serves a purpose.

She's fully clothed and looks good. There's nothing lewd or inappropriate about it and I think it's a shame some people find it offensive.