topic THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!! in Community Chat

THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Plaid Pants2 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:22:48 GMT

For taking out the trash!!!

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

juperier — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:25:41 GMT

Yes, thank you!

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

CelticCrafter — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:27:23 GMT

Must be the full moon, too early for school breaks.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Plaid Pants2 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:28:17 GMT

@CelticCrafter wrote:
Must be the full moon, too early for school breaks.

@CelticCrafter

Yeah, usually this nonsense happens on Christmas Eve!

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

OKPrincess — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 12:31:09 GMT

Yes thank you. I appreciate everyone at QVC.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

addymarie — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:55:24 GMT

I agree - great job!!!

The 2 YR old thread was bumped & it's still there.

Maybe they're still working on poofing the old thread bumps?

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

KingstonsMom — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:03:19 GMT

@addymarie

That thread has now been locked.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

addymarie — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:07:13 GMT

@KingstonsMom wrote:
@addymarie

That thread has now been locked.

@KingstonsMom

thanks!

they are on the job!

❤️❤️❤️

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

sidsmom — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 13:44:11 GMT

There are 2 closed threads.

The author of one & contributor of another look to be

the same writer, but they have different nics.

And the author of the one written was in 2010.

Humm.

Maybe testing the waters for Christmas Eve?

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

goldensrbest — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:03:46 GMT

Why shut down the thread on favorite sweets?

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Caaareful Shopper — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:06:12 GMT

@goldensrbest wrote:
Why shut down the thread on favorite sweets?

@goldensrbest That thread was many years old -- from 2013. There are forum standards for not bumping up threads like that.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Cakers3 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:14:24 GMT

@sidsmom wrote:
There are 2 closed threads.
The author of one & contributor of another look to be
the same writer, but they have different nics.
And the author of the one written was in 2010.

Humm.
Maybe testing the waters for Christmas Eve?

@sidsmom Of course they are. We go through this every year and every year people post on the threads the troll started and/or on the bumped up threads.

This is what the troll wants; just report to the mods and let it be.

Nobody is telling the troll something everyone doesn't know, including the troll.

Feeding this nonsense everytime just encourages he/she/it/them to continue.

The bumped up threads are easily taken care of if the Q would only lock them after a certain period of time.

The new ones won't have any impact if people would stop posting on them and starting threads "WE HAVE A TROLL". Well no kidding.

Every single time. Same boat, different crew. It's just as annoying as the troll.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

suzyQ3 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:42:59 GMT

Okay. I checked out the sweets thread. That poster is not new and, based on a quick look at her profile, does not appear to be a troll.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

WenGirl42 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:12:46 GMT

@suzyQ3 I don't think that's what @sidsmom was suggesting. There is a closed thread about money/husband trouble that I think is the one she's talking about (the new one posted), and that individual may be the one who bumped the other threads, including the sweets thread. Lately the mods have been deleting the "bumping" comment though, so it's hard to follow the sequence of events and can make it look like established posters are the ones bumping the old threads.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

juperier — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:13:52 GMT

Actually, the troll who was bothering me was the new poster who, while they did post a few one or two word comments to existing posts, started many, many threads with biblical quotes. Then moved on to starting threads that were regarding sexual preferance. Honestly, I wasn't about to even open any of the threads they started and give them the satisfaction of a 'view.'

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

suzyQ3 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:22:41 GMT

@WenGirl42, I was going by @goldensrbest's post here in which she mentioned the favorite sweets thread.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Plaid Pants2 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 18:57:58 GMT

@WenGirl42 wrote:
@suzyQ3 I don't think that's what @sidsmom was suggesting. There is a closed thread about money/husband trouble that I think is the one she's talking about (the new one posted), and that individual may be the one who bumped the other threads, including the sweets thread. Lately the mods have been deleting the "bumping" comment though, so it's hard to follow the sequence of events and can make it look like established posters are the ones bumping the old threads.

@WenGirl42

@suzyQ3

The morning troll that was bumping ancient threads (threads that were seven years old!) by posting 1 - 3 words, or an , were removed by the mods, so it is like that troll never even existed.

In other words, any and all posts that the troll made, have been removed by the mods.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

juperier — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:22:45 GMT

I'm assuming it was all the same troll. One thing I didn't do was look at what the original date was on the ones with comments. Around 50 new threads and posts, so Mod was busy deleting for a while.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Moonchilde — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:31:16 GMT

@suzyQ3 wrote:
@WenGirl42, I was going by @goldensrbest's post here in which she mentioned the favorite sweets thread.

That thread being reactivated had nothing to do with a troll, unless the troll’s post was deleted so that you couldn’t tell it was ever there. A regular poster to these forums posted in it, and it wasn’t a bump, it was a genuine post. That poster was accused of being a deliberate troll, though. As to why the poster chose that old thread, I don’t know - unless a moderator deleted a troll post and forgot to lock/poof the thread before they moved on.

Re: THANK-YOU, MODS!!!!!

Plaid Pants2 — Mon, 04 Dec 2017 20:40:22 GMT

@Moonchilde wrote:
@suzyQ3 wrote:
@WenGirl42, I was going by @goldensrbest's post here in which she mentioned the favorite sweets thread.

That thread being reactivated had nothing to do with a troll, unless the troll’s post was deleted so that you couldn’t tell it was ever there. A regular poster to these forums posted in it, and it wasn’t a bump, it was a genuine post. That poster was accused of being a deliberate troll, though. As to why the poster chose that old thread, I don’t know - unless a moderator deleted a troll post and forgot to lock/poof the thread before they moved on.

@Moonchilde

The troll that was here this morning, was also bumping up old threads, by posting a few words on them.

The mods came along, and removed the post that the troll made in those threads.

So it looks like a regular poster brought up an old thread, when the truth is, they didn't, the troll did.