<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017 in Community Chat</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715873#M1073137</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, software!&amp;nbsp; I enjoy your exuberance and encouragement!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This whole thing-- It's a fine line though, isn't it?&amp;nbsp; Of course I'm not sorry to post the list at all, and to me it makes sense--&amp;nbsp; at least some of those ten states that I'm familiar with seem to be following strategies that are good for their economic health.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But, I wasn't realizing that the link might have some extraneous political stuff on it, as someone suggested it might, in addition to the good economic news.&amp;nbsp; I didn't check, at any rate.&amp;nbsp; And I want to be transparent, not try to slyly "slip things by" the moderators, whose rules are that there be nothing political.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We all have our world views, which probably shape our politics (or is it the other way around? That would be a good debate.) &amp;nbsp; So it's hard sometimes to distinguish what's general enough to be 'acceptable", from what is the product of a very particular viewpoint that violates the rules...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 20:13:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Oznell</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-24T20:13:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715426#M1073009</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The ALEC-Laffer State Economic Outlook Rankings for this year are out now.&amp;nbsp; The top ten rankings are:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Utah&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Indiana&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;North Carolina&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;North Dakota&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tennessee&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Florida&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Wyoming&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Arizona&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Texas&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Idaho&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Interesting to see North Dakota up there.&amp;nbsp; I'm assuming that's because the oil boom must be continuing?&amp;nbsp; It's good to see states move up to prosperity.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I'm going to leave off the bottom 10 states, out of consideration for those of us who live in them and might get depressed!&amp;nbsp; Congrats, top ten!&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:45:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715426#M1073009</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oznell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:45:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715460#M1073019</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;This is not a source I would put any faith in. &amp;nbsp;😏&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:30:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715460#M1073019</guid>
      <dc:creator>tansy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:30:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715472#M1073022</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/105926"&gt;@tansy&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;This is not a source I would put any faith in. &amp;nbsp;😏&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;i agree tansy.....definitely take the information provided with a grain of salt.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:36:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715472#M1073022</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunshine45</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:36:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715478#M1073024</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Property Tax burden for NJ almost 55.00 just one of the reason so I am not surprised we pay for the rest of the country in different ways as does NY,Conn and Calif. We are always in the top for highest earners in the nation. If we were to be like the states in the top of this ranking then we all would be in trouble.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:38:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715478#M1073024</guid>
      <dc:creator>AngusandBuddhasMom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:38:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715497#M1073026</link>
      <description>This post has been removed by QVC  political</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:42:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715497#M1073026</guid>
      <dc:creator>Susan-QVC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:42:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715492#M1073028</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;For a balanced view of how the states are doing, better sources would be the CBO.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;DIV class="ad-in-text-target "&gt;&lt;P&gt;U.S. News, with deep experience in rankings and analysis, has assembled thousands of data points about the states and produced an &lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/data-explorer" target="_blank"&gt;online portal&lt;/A&gt; that enables anyone to easily see what makes some states stronger and draw comparisons with others. The project is powered by a Leading States Index developed by &lt;STRONG&gt;McKinsey &amp;amp; Company,&lt;/STRONG&gt; which has extensive experience in consulting focused on the improvement of state governance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="ad-in-text-target "&gt;&lt;P&gt;The benchmarks reach across seven broad categories – health care, education, &lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings/opportunity" target="_blank"&gt;opportunity&lt;/A&gt;, economy, infrastructure, &lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/rankings/crime-and-corrections" target="_blank"&gt;crime &amp;amp; corrections&lt;/A&gt; and government – and include 68 metrics within the larger categories. The data come from reliable governmental and private sources, and the weight assigned to each category is based on a survey that McKinsey conducted about what matters most to people about their states.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="ad-in-text-target "&gt;&lt;P&gt;"What we've helped do is collect a wide range of data – a lot of data from publicly available sources," says McKinsey's Andre Dua. "But we've also created our own proprietary data, particularly into how citizens view the performance of governments."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class=" "&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="ad-in-text-target "&gt;&lt;P&gt;Health care and education are weighted most heavily.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;&lt;DIV class="ad-in-text-target "&gt;&lt;P&gt;And for this reason, &lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/massachusetts" target="_blank"&gt;Massachusetts&lt;/A&gt; – which ranks No. 1 nationally in education and No. 2 in health care in all of these metrics – stands out as the overall No. 1 Best State. &lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/new-hampshire" target="_blank"&gt;New Hampshire&lt;/A&gt; – No 1 in opportunity for its citizens – ranks No. 2 overall. &lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/minnesota" target="_blank"&gt;Minnesota&lt;/A&gt; – No. 2 in opportunity, No. 5 for infrastructure – ranks No. 3.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2017-02-28/best-states-explores-which-states-are-best-serving-their-citizens" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.usnews.com/news/best-states/articles/2017-02-28/best-states-explores-which-states-are-best-serving-their-citizens&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/DIV&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:42:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715492#M1073028</guid>
      <dc:creator>itiswhatitis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:42:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715503#M1073032</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You need to look for unbiased sources for such info. Always know your source!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:45:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715503#M1073032</guid>
      <dc:creator>libbyannE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:45:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715522#M1073038</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm sure that the list does not include states that have made &lt;STRIKE&gt;millions&lt;/STRIKE&gt; billions&amp;nbsp;in the marijuana industry.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 17:56:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715522#M1073038</guid>
      <dc:creator>SilleeMee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T17:56:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715523#M1073039</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Some states shine in health care. Some soar in education. Some excel in both – or in much more. The Best States ranking of U.S. states draws on thousands of data points to measure how well states are performing for their citizens. In addition to health care and education, the metrics take into account a state’s economy, the opportunity it offers people, its roads, bridges, internet and other infrastructure, its public safety and the integrity and health of state government.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;More weight was accorded to some state measures than others, based on a survey of what matters most to people. Health care and education were weighted most heavily. Then came the opportunity states offer their citizens, their crime &amp;amp; corrections and infrastructure. State economies followed closely in weighting, followed by measures of government administration. This explains why Massachusetts, ranking No. 1 in education and No. 2 in health care, occupies the overall No. 1 spot in the Best States rankings. And it explains why New Hampshire, ranking No. 1 in opportunity for its citizens, ranks No. 2 overall in the Best States rankings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Parameters such as Health Care, Education, Crime and Corrections, Infrastructure, Opportunity, Economy and Government are used to come up with the top 10 list.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:37:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715523#M1073039</guid>
      <dc:creator>itiswhatitis</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:37:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715607#M1073065</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am a bit baffled that the link I provided to the state economic outlook rankings in my original post disappearred, while another one provided by another poster is left in?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But that's OK.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think people should be able to see all different ways of determining prosperity rankings, and those interested will be easily able to seek them out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever way you judge them, I'm pleased for any and all states that are able to improve their prospects, but I'm disappointed that some posters don't want everyone to have access to a variety of points of view.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:26:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715607#M1073065</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oznell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:26:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715619#M1073067</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Funny that your post was edited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have a problem with your source.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went and peeked at the bottom 10, whew, my state is NOT on it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At least not now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:30:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715619#M1073067</guid>
      <dc:creator>software</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:30:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715626#M1073071</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I am a bit baffled that the link I provided to the state economic outlook rankings in my original post disappearred, while another one provided by another poster is left in?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But that's OK.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think people should be able to see all different ways of determining prosperity rankings, and those interested will be easily able to seek them out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever way you judge them, I'm pleased for any and all states that are able to improve their prospects, but I'm disappointed that some posters don't want everyone to have access to a variety of points of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:32:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715626#M1073071</guid>
      <dc:creator>software</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:32:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715629#M1073073</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/241422"&gt;@software&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT color="#FF0000"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;I am a bit baffled that the link I provided to the state economic outlook rankings in my original post disappearred, while another one provided by another poster is left in?&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But that's OK.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think people should be able to see all different ways of determining prosperity rankings, and those interested will be easily able to seek them out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever way you judge them, I'm pleased for any and all states that are able to improve their prospects, but I'm disappointed that some posters don't want everyone to have access to a variety of points of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exactly!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;My guess is someone complained. Anyway, I'm sure everyone knows where to find all the pertinent info.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:34:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715629#M1073073</guid>
      <dc:creator>proudlyfromNJ</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:34:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715636#M1073077</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks, software.&amp;nbsp; I have no problem with anyone disputing the detailed and complicated ways that the link determnes the rankings--&amp;nbsp; more power to them!&amp;nbsp; I still maintain more information is better than less--&amp;nbsp; let a variety of sources be consulted, and people are usually smart enough to discern whether they are valid for them...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:37:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715636#M1073077</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oznell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:37:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715639#M1073078</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/241422"&gt;@software&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Funny that your post was edited.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't have a problem with your source.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I went and peeked at the bottom 10, whew, my state is NOT on it!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At least not now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your states are doing well because they don't take on the burden of the states that payer higher taxes across the board. So yes it is not a good source because it is not explaining why they are doing better or what would happen if they actually had to pay what others pay.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715639#M1073078</guid>
      <dc:creator>AngusandBuddhasMom</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:36:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715650#M1073081</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks, software.&amp;nbsp; I have no problem with anyone disputing the detailed and complicated ways that the link determnes the rankings--&amp;nbsp; more power to them!&amp;nbsp; I still maintain more information is better than less--&amp;nbsp; let a variety of sources be consulted, and people are usually smart enough to discern whether they are valid for them...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;Everyone here knows how to Google. &amp;nbsp;Your source is still there. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:40:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715650#M1073081</guid>
      <dc:creator>tansy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:40:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715654#M1073083</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/27376"&gt;@AngusandBuddhasMom&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;I agree.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Even though this or that state ranks high for this or that, I clearly wouldn't want to live there regardless of the so called stats and ratings.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;CA has always done well in covering their legal and illegal occupants depending on the different couties.&amp;nbsp; Taxes - we pay too much to provide for others.&amp;nbsp; We probably could be our own country.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:41:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715654#M1073083</guid>
      <dc:creator>Puzzle Piece</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:41:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715665#M1073087</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;caravaggio, I agree totally that some states are hideously over-taxed!&amp;nbsp; I've lived in at least one of them.&amp;nbsp; The heavy tax burden did not improve the standard of living, the infrastructure, or the lack of creation of new jobs. Perhaps it is good to have a variety of ways of determining economic health...&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:43:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715665#M1073087</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oznell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:43:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715668#M1073088</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am a bit baffled that the link I provided to the state economic outlook rankings in my original post disappearred, while another one provided by another poster is left in?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But that's OK.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I think people should be able to see all different ways of determining prosperity rankings, and those interested will be easily able to seek them out.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Whatever way you judge them, I'm pleased for any and all states that are able to improve their prospects, but I'm disappointed that some posters don't want everyone to have access to a variety of points of view.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;the pdf you linked to can be found easily if anyone wants to see all of the information from that source. my guess is is that the mod deleted the link because it does have a lot of "political" references and topics in it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;if you notice, the other links were deleted also.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:45:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715668#M1073088</guid>
      <dc:creator>sunshine45</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:45:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Economic Prospects by State, 2017</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715674#M1073092</link>
      <description>&lt;BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.qvc.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/51775"&gt;@Oznell&lt;/a&gt; wrote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;P&gt;The ALEC-Laffer State Economic Outlook Rankings for this year are out now.&amp;nbsp; The top ten rankings are:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Utah&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Indiana&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;North Carolina&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;North Dakota&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tennessee&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Florida&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Wyoming&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Arizona&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Texas&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Idaho&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Interesting to see North Dakota up there.&amp;nbsp; I'm assuming that's because the oil boom must be continuing?&amp;nbsp; It's good to see states move up to prosperity.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm going to leave off the bottom 10 states, out of consideration for those of us who live in them and might get depressed!&amp;nbsp; Congrats, top ten!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;HR /&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;P&gt;A friend who has a number of relatives in the oil biz lost their jobs a few years back due to the boom busting.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 24 Apr 2017 18:44:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Community-Chat/Economic-Prospects-by-State-2017/m-p/3715674#M1073092</guid>
      <dc:creator>QueenDanceALot</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-24T18:44:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

