topic Wrap Up Quacker Show Today in Q Talk

Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

dulwich — Sat, 24 Dec 2016 21:00:37 GMT

I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Kachina624 — Sat, 24 Dec 2016 22:55:42 GMT

She was really wired today, even more than usual. Excited like a kid on Christmas eve, I guess.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

AuntG — Sat, 24 Dec 2016 22:59:08 GMT

What host did the wrap up before they went off the air?

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Snoopp — Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:02:39 GMT

The last host I saw was Jane. Her daughters were on air and they looked very pretty.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Kachina624 — Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:39:55 GMT

@Snoopp wrote:
The last host I saw was Jane. Her daughters were on air and they looked very pretty.

@Snoopp The daughters have a really laid back demeanor to tolerate being paraded before the QVC cameras. Most young people their ages would have their own agendas. Very pretty girls; I think Diedra has the fairest skin I've ever seen.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

GCR18 — Sat, 24 Dec 2016 23:48:35 GMT

I didn't notice anything out of the ordinary.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

BalletBabe — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:24:40 GMT

@dulwich wrote:
I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.

I agree, and I also had to shut it off.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Venezia — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:31:56 GMT

@dulwich wrote:
I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.

Well, since this post appears to have been made at 4:00 p.m. and the show ended at 4:00 p.m. - it doesn't seem you turned off too fast. You waited till it finished to say you were "turning off now"? (Everyone "turned it off" then, as they went into the pre-recorded segments.)

Is it too much to ask that at least on Christmas Eve, you cut the hosts some slack? One day to let it go?

I watched this right to the end and I saw Jane (yes, Jane - it's okay to say her name; no need for "this host") and Angel getting along just fine. And no one makes Angel just "stand there"; she's very capable of speaking up and does! Must've been watching a different show, but I recorded it so, just in case I missed something, I'll go watch it again.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Snoopp — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:35:14 GMT

@Kachina624 wrote:
@Snoopp wrote:
The last host I saw was Jane. Her daughters were on air and they looked very pretty.
@Snoopp The daughters have a really laid back demeanor to tolerate being paraded before the QVC cameras. Most young people their ages would have their own agendas. Very pretty girls; I think Diedra has the fairest skin I've ever seen.

Oh didn't she have lovely skin? It matched her dress too.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

proudlyfromNJ — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:41:29 GMT

I enjoyed the Quacker show and I usually don't watch those. I do like Jane, she is one of my favorite hosts. Her daughters are very pretty.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

BalletBabe — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:47:11 GMT

@Venezia wrote:
@dulwich wrote:
I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.
Well, since this post appears to have been made at 4:00 p.m. and the show ended at 4:00 p.m. - it doesn't seem you turned off too fast. You waited till it finished to say you were "turning off now"? (Everyone "turned it off" then, as they went into the pre-recorded segments.)

Is it too much to ask that at least on Christmas Eve, you cut the hosts some slack? One day to let it go?

I watched this right to the end and I saw Jane (yes, Jane - it's okay to say her name; no need for "this host") and Angel getting along just fine. And no one makes Angel just "stand there"; she's very capable of speaking up and does! Must've been watching a different show, but I recorded it so, just in case I missed something, I'll go watch it again.

Well my post didn't appear after 7:00. That don't mean I watched the whole show.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

DukeBlueNan — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 00:51:07 GMT

@Kachina624

Deirdra does have beautiful skin. (I have no idea how to spell her name.) Honestly, I cannot understand why the girls are on so frequently and why they want to be. Unless she's grooming them to be hosts.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Venezia — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 05:07:06 GMT

@BalletBabe wrote:
@Venezia wrote:
@dulwich wrote:
I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.
Well, since this post appears to have been made at 4:00 p.m. and the show ended at 4:00 p.m. - it doesn't seem you turned off too fast. You waited till it finished to say you were "turning off now"? (Everyone "turned it off" then, as they went into the pre-recorded segments.)

Is it too much to ask that at least on Christmas Eve, you cut the hosts some slack? One day to let it go?

I watched this right to the end and I saw Jane (yes, Jane - it's okay to say her name; no need for "this host") and Angel getting along just fine. And no one makes Angel just "stand there"; she's very capable of speaking up and does! Must've been watching a different show, but I recorded it so, just in case I missed something, I'll go watch it again.
Well my post didn't appear after 7:00. That don't mean I watched the whole show.

The OP said "turning off now", which means she had just switched off the show. That's why I underlined that sentence. It had nothing to do with when you watched (or didn't); it wasn't directed to you.

And I still stand by what I said - can't some posters just give the host bashing a rest for even one night? Especially at Christmas?

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

suzyQ3 — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 18:14:57 GMT

For some reason, I happened to have this show on, mainly as white noise. But wow, it really was a mess. Not only did the two talk over each other constantly, but Jane kept going completely off topic and staying there way too long. It was not enjoyable, and yes, I finally decided that silence was better than white noise this time.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

corita — Sun, 25 Dec 2016 18:49:45 GMT

So I noticed too much talking during the midnight show with Sandra and Angel. They both told personal story after story and really, the clothing got very little show time. I have stated before...please...hosts, focus on the product and cut out the personal stories. I don't want to hear them and the continuous personal tales do not incentivize me to buy the item/clothing.

I ended up just changing the channel and then looking at

Items Recently Aired.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

BalletBabe — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:41:04 GMT

@Venezia wrote:
@BalletBabe wrote:
@Venezia wrote:
@dulwich wrote:
I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.
Well, since this post appears to have been made at 4:00 p.m. and the show ended at 4:00 p.m. - it doesn't seem you turned off too fast. You waited till it finished to say you were "turning off now"? (Everyone "turned it off" then, as they went into the pre-recorded segments.)

Is it too much to ask that at least on Christmas Eve, you cut the hosts some slack? One day to let it go?

I watched this right to the end and I saw Jane (yes, Jane - it's okay to say her name; no need for "this host") and Angel getting along just fine. And no one makes Angel just "stand there"; she's very capable of speaking up and does! Must've been watching a different :00show, but I recorded it so, just in case I missed something, I'll go watch it again.
Well my post didn't appear after 7:00. That don't mean I watched the whole show.
The OP said "turning off now", which means she had just switched off the show. That's why I underlined that sentence. It had nothing to do with when you watched (or didn't); it wasn't directed to you.

And I still stand by what I said - can't some posters just give the host bashing a rest for even one night? Especially at Christmas?

I Know it wasn't directed at me, but you are missing my point. She may have shut it off at 3:00, but didn't post till 4:00.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

BalletBabe — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 00:45:18 GMT

@corita I don't think some of the hosts realize how fast they babble. Christmas or not, if we don't point out that it isn't about them, things will never change.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Venezia — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 04:47:18 GMT

@BalletBabe wrote:
@Venezia wrote:
@BalletBabe wrote:
@Venezia wrote:
@dulwich wrote:
I think the host on this needs to let Angel speak now'n then. Enthusiasm is one thing but this host goes on and on and cuts across Angel that is when Angel gets a word in mostly she stands there looking at this host. Turning off now. Hosts need to stop the constant constant yakking.
Well, since this post appears to have been made at 4:00 p.m. and the show ended at 4:00 p.m. - it doesn't seem you turned off too fast. You waited till it finished to say you were "turning off now"? (Everyone "turned it off" then, as they went into the pre-recorded segments.)

Is it too much to ask that at least on Christmas Eve, you cut the hosts some slack? One day to let it go?

I watched this right to the end and I saw Jane (yes, Jane - it's okay to say her name; no need for "this host") and Angel getting along just fine. And no one makes Angel just "stand there"; she's very capable of speaking up and does! Must've been watching a different :00show, but I recorded it so, just in case I missed something, I'll go watch it again.
Well my post didn't appear after 7:00. That don't mean I watched the whole show.
The OP said "turning off now", which means she had just switched off the show. That's why I underlined that sentence. It had nothing to do with when you watched (or didn't); it wasn't directed to you.

And I still stand by what I said - can't some posters just give the host bashing a rest for even one night? Especially at Christmas?
I Know it wasn't directed at me, but you are missing my point. She may have shut it off at 3:00, but didn't post till 4:00.

I'm not missing your point. But if you say "turning it off now" that indicates you are turning off at the point at which you're speaking (or writing). Not an hour ago or two hours ago. In that case you'd say "I turned it off".

No point in debating further, however. I watched the show again, because I was "half-listening" the first time (busy) and I still didn't see anything wrong with it. I just felt they were in a more relaxed mood as it was Christmas Eve. They were both troopers, IMO, to be there doing shows all day yesterday.

Some people weren't happy with it; others of us thought it was fine.

Re: Wrap Up Quacker Show Today

Venezia — Mon, 26 Dec 2016 04:50:51 GMT

@BalletBabe wrote:
@corita I don't think some of the hosts realize how fast they babble. Christmas or not, if we don't point out that it isn't about them, things will never change.

LOL - posters on these boards have been pointing out the "flaws" in each and every host for years. It hasn't changed a thing!