topic Re: Logo in Q Talk

Logo

bookwriter — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:02:33 GMT

I'm a big fan of logo and have many pieces. But I'm becoming increasingly upset over the prices. $67.00 for a pair of knit sport pants is not only out of my price range but outrageous for everyday people for not even dress pants. Along with the rising prices and decreasing quality control issues I'm having I'm seriously considering suspending shopping at the Q. I'm a 30 year customer so it has taken some extreme issues to get me to this point, but I fear I am there.

Re: Logo

Melania — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:24:17 GMT

I agree. If it were a better quality maybe but that is not going to happen.

There are many stores who offer better quality and have sales or coupons to offest the costs. Easy pay is not a discount.

Re: Logo

Knew10 — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:32:38 GMT

I could be wrong but I believe QVC sets the prices. Since Logo popularity has grown so have the prices. Currently there are 334 items listed between $50.00 and $100.00. My older Logo items are my favorites because the fabric was better quality.

Re: Logo

Goodie2shoes — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 22:51:42 GMT

as I just responded to another post on Logo, I don't like this brand, sloppy look. Now I see A261080 for $74.92, are you kidding me ! I happended to turn on the TV, see this show so it's time to check my shows on DVR. Again to each her own

Re: Logo

sarpy — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:04:13 GMT

Way overpriced!!!!

Re: Logo

Brigitta — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:11:37 GMT

People really come down on you if you post anything negative about Logo. Simply... it's just not for everyone. Not all of us look good in every style or care for it. It doesn't matter where you live or how much money you have, you shouldn't jump on people's opinion of certain styles. Play nice girls........

Re: Logo

Melania — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:13:40 GMT

Almost 90 bucks for a top with embellishments?? It's so ridiculous.

Re: Logo

Q4u — Sun, 10 Jan 2016 23:39:14 GMT

I like some of the fashions, especially the earlier cardigans and vests. I don't like the layer look especially and that's one reason I don't care for most of it. Also the fit is tight across the shoulders and bust and flares out at the stomach and rear and most of it just feels uncomfortable on me.

Lori was just talking about proportions in her clothing, that all the layers on top are fine because you have leggings on the bottom and yet (to my untrained eye) all I see are mounds of material on top of pipe stem legs. Now I'm looking at a gorgeous model with leggings, a tank top and a cardigan that looks spectacular on her ... and Sharon looks wonderful in her outfit and then it pans to Lori who looks buried in layers.

Please don't get me wrong, I rather like Lori, I like and own some of her line but it's definitely not a look for everyone....

Re: Logo

blackhole99 — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:47:01 GMT

I almost bought something of hers tonight, but the color I wanted sold out. I like little of what Lori has to offer and I agree the garments are way over priced. I think the Q is over exposing Logo too, even the Logo lovers will lose interest after a while.

Re: Logo

Karnerblue — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 00:53:32 GMT

Pick your price. Too high, don't buy it.

Re: Logo

Q4u — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 01:30:13 GMT

@baker wrote:
I almost bought something of hers tonight, but the color I wanted sold out. I like little of what Lori has to offer and I agree the garments are way over priced. I think the Q is over exposing Logo too, even the Logo lovers will lose interest after a while.

And the problem I see is that the uniqueness of the fashion is now all starting to look alike and I agree that Logo is on all the time, but ladies seem to love it and frankly QVC will go with it until sales drop. I really liked the cardigan with the zippered pockets in white, thought it would look great in the spring/summer but decided not to buy. I think the prices are kind of high but if I love it enough, I'll buy it.

Re: Logo

suzyQ3 — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:01:31 GMT

@Brigitta wrote:
People really come down on you if you post anything negative about Logo. Simply... it's just not for everyone. Not all of us look good in every style or care for it. It doesn't matter where you live or how much money you have, you shouldn't jump on people's opinion of certain styles. Play nice girls........

Usually people come down only on negative posts in which the poster is so insulting that it's difficult not to see the comment as an attack on the customer herself.

Re: Logo

Lipstickdiva — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 17:14:51 GMT

@suzyQ3 wrote:
@Brigitta wrote:
People really come down on you if you post anything negative about Logo. Simply... it's just not for everyone. Not all of us look good in every style or care for it. It doesn't matter where you live or how much money you have, you shouldn't jump on people's opinion of certain styles. Play nice girls........
Usually people come down only on negative posts in which the poster is so insulting that it's difficult not to see the comment as an attack on the customer herself.

Most of the time this is true but there are a few who are avid LOGO lovers and you had better not say even the slightest negative thing about LOGO. They can say all the negative they want about other lines though.

Re: Logo

Pearlee — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 19:04:27 GMT

Some people on here really exaggerate the truth.

Re: Logo

Skididdy — Mon, 11 Jan 2016 21:50:09 GMT

Yes it is a shame. Some of her items are nice but just so overpriced. I really wish her items could come down in price. I watch her shows, wish I could order some things but cannot take the chance any longer of maybe liking the item on my body shape, and if not , getting stuck with return fees that take forever to post on my credit card.

For people on a budget, this just doesnt work any longer for me.

So I guess no more watching logo shows sadly.

For those you can afford a 77.00 sweatshirt, you are lucky.

Re: Logo

Melania — Tue, 12 Jan 2016 01:41:04 GMT

Maybe they are reading these threads as there have been two one time only's in the past two days and not just $5 off either. Hmm...

Re: Logo

kzjohnson — Tue, 12 Jan 2016 14:00:25 GMT

I'm a LOGO addict and I've been very vocal about how insane the pricing has gotten over the years.

Talk all you want about the price of fabric, the cost of labor, whatever When it comes right down to it, it's about making the largest profit margin you can. (Greed is good!) Obviously jacking the prices up and up is not stopping the consumer from buying LOGO. It's really limiting this consumer, but I'm only one tiny little fish in a giant pond. If people continue to buy the prices will continue to escalate.

So lately, most of my QVC fashion purchases have been OTOs, clearance or as is.

Re: Logo

Proudmommy — Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:48:16 GMT

I love my Logo! It makes me feel confident. It's so comfy. I don't and probably won't buy any of the super pricy sweaters, and you can find deals! I am about a year in, roughly I buy 1 - 2 items per month. Everything is holding up & I think it's well worth the money considering how it makes me feel.

Re: Logo

Peaches McPhee — Tue, 12 Jan 2016 17:50:33 GMT

I agree with OP.

Try "as is" or ebay.

Re: Logo

Pearlee — Wed, 13 Jan 2016 00:28:54 GMT

@Lipstickdiva wrote:
@suzyQ3 wrote:
@Brigitta wrote:
People really come down on you if you post anything negative about Logo. Simply... it's just not for everyone. Not all of us look good in every style or care for it. It doesn't matter where you live or how much money you have, you shouldn't jump on people's opinion of certain styles. Play nice girls........
Usually people come down only on negative posts in which the poster is so insulting that it's difficult not to see the comment as an attack on the customer herself.
Most of the time this is true but there are a few who are avid LOGO lovers and you had better not say even the slightest negative thing about LOGO. They can say all the negative they want about other lines though.

This is a veiled reference to me @Lipstickdiva@ as discerned from your other numerous posts directly to me. IMO you are grossly exaggerating, and @suzyQ3's post is correct.