<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Returning items is way too costly in Q Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Returning-items-is-way-too-costly/m-p/173411#M2528</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Not only does Q charge too much for shipping, returns are extremely costly.  I returned a very lightweight jacket today (in the Q bag) and w/insurance it cost $7.55.  The jacket had been on sale for under $17.00.  It was my mistake that I ordered the wrong size, but I won't be buying clothing (except for Linea) at Q any more.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Daysdee</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-03-16T19:48:01Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Returning items is way too costly</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Returning-items-is-way-too-costly/m-p/173411#M2528</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Not only does Q charge too much for shipping, returns are extremely costly.  I returned a very lightweight jacket today (in the Q bag) and w/insurance it cost $7.55.  The jacket had been on sale for under $17.00.  It was my mistake that I ordered the wrong size, but I won't be buying clothing (except for Linea) at Q any more.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Mar 2012 19:48:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Returning-items-is-way-too-costly/m-p/173411#M2528</guid>
      <dc:creator>Daysdee</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-03-16T19:48:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

