<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic TSV Grammar in Q Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/TSV-Grammar/m-p/131607#M2042</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;"And, their priced right for giving" from the verbiage about the slipper TSV today. I just can't let it go. Sorry. This isn't something for a forum really but perhaps someone from Q will see my comment &amp;amp; effect a quick edit. Sentence as shown has more than 1 error but all except "their" could be attributed to poetic license. Maybe you need an English major proofing the text...?  Please revise to the correct "they're."  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LilysSister</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-21T16:12:52Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>TSV Grammar</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/TSV-Grammar/m-p/131607#M2042</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;"And, their priced right for giving" from the verbiage about the slipper TSV today. I just can't let it go. Sorry. This isn't something for a forum really but perhaps someone from Q will see my comment &amp;amp; effect a quick edit. Sentence as shown has more than 1 error but all except "their" could be attributed to poetic license. Maybe you need an English major proofing the text...?  Please revise to the correct "they're."  &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Nov 2011 16:12:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/TSV-Grammar/m-p/131607#M2042</guid>
      <dc:creator>LilysSister</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-21T16:12:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

