<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic No Alternative To Facebook For Sweepstakes? in Q Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/No-Alternative-To-Facebook-For-Sweepstakes/m-p/126774#M1964</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I am disgusted with Q for not offering an alternative method of entering such a great sweepstakes other than Facebook.  Wonder how many other Qers are excluded because they refuse to sign up with Facebook.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Hopefully someone can point out that I overlooked an alternate method of entering.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 02:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Marp</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-11-03T02:20:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>No Alternative To Facebook For Sweepstakes?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/No-Alternative-To-Facebook-For-Sweepstakes/m-p/126774#M1964</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am disgusted with Q for not offering an alternative method of entering such a great sweepstakes other than Facebook.  Wonder how many other Qers are excluded because they refuse to sign up with Facebook.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Hopefully someone can point out that I overlooked an alternate method of entering.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Nov 2011 02:20:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/No-Alternative-To-Facebook-For-Sweepstakes/m-p/126774#M1964</guid>
      <dc:creator>Marp</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-11-03T02:20:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

