topic Fake dot.com models, getting to be really really obvious in Q Talk

Fake dot.com models, getting to be really really obvious

cindy sue — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 04:55:17 GMT

The clothes look so bad of the dot.com models, can hardly stand looking on line anymore. They are obviously fake, body parts attached here and there that are the same on most of the models, especially the hands. The clothes look terrible. You should go back to using the QVC models.

Re: Fake dot.com models, getting to be really really obvious

depglass — Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:20:33 GMT

The Insider is professionally shot, there is no reason online photos can't be. Sometimes you just wonder. Maybe they are trying to show the worst look so you won't be disappointed when you look worse than the model.

Re: Fake dot.com models, getting to be really really obvious

stevieb — Tue, 23 Sep 2014 16:54:48 GMT

I think we simply have to accept the evidence presented to us in SO many ways that the Q powers that be are completely content with a website that screams of mediocrity, at best.

Re: Fake dot.com models, getting to be really really obvious

HappyDaze — Tue, 23 Sep 2014 17:24:45 GMT

I soooo don't understand this post! What are "fake" models? Do you mean they use mannequins instead? I'm confused, lol.

Re: Fake dot.com models, getting to be really really obvious

depglass — Wed, 24 Sep 2014 15:59:48 GMT

Who knows what they are? Check out any pair of pants or leggings. They are shown in the most unattractive way possible. Poor pose, too short, wrinkled, etc.