<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Inspector #803 possibly needs glasses in Q Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Inspector-803-possibly-needs-glasses/m-p/80112#M1079</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;It's very rare that I receive anything with the Quality Inspected label attached to the product but today I received a pair of Life Stride pink espadrilles with that very label adhered to the top of the box.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Upon opening the box to look at the shoes, sure enough was a spot of unknown substance attached to the top of the shoe (and I'm not even a paid inspector) that I noticed immediately.  No, I can't take my fingernail and rub it off.  Does it show, yes, when it's on my foot, not really....but I have a hard time believing that your inspectors actually put the shoes on.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;...now for the left shoe&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;fragments of a loose strand of juke and glue actually protruding from the toe of the shoe.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Overall, I realize this may happen with the manufacturing on pairs of shoes that "just are sent through the system" but this pair was physically inspected by #803.  What they are checking is beyond me but I sure wouldn't of passed these through unless it's actually acceptable to Q standards?  What are the standards?  Are these people just taking a paycheck and not really doing their job?  &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;I seriously would review procedures in QC and especially with #803.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Mistreatedbycs</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-18T17:46:51Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Inspector #803 possibly needs glasses</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Inspector-803-possibly-needs-glasses/m-p/80112#M1079</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;It's very rare that I receive anything with the Quality Inspected label attached to the product but today I received a pair of Life Stride pink espadrilles with that very label adhered to the top of the box.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Upon opening the box to look at the shoes, sure enough was a spot of unknown substance attached to the top of the shoe (and I'm not even a paid inspector) that I noticed immediately.  No, I can't take my fingernail and rub it off.  Does it show, yes, when it's on my foot, not really....but I have a hard time believing that your inspectors actually put the shoes on.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;...now for the left shoe&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;fragments of a loose strand of juke and glue actually protruding from the toe of the shoe.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;Overall, I realize this may happen with the manufacturing on pairs of shoes that "just are sent through the system" but this pair was physically inspected by #803.  What they are checking is beyond me but I sure wouldn't of passed these through unless it's actually acceptable to Q standards?  What are the standards?  Are these people just taking a paycheck and not really doing their job?  &lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;I seriously would review procedures in QC and especially with #803.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 May 2011 17:46:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Inspector-803-possibly-needs-glasses/m-p/80112#M1079</guid>
      <dc:creator>Mistreatedbycs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-18T17:46:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

