<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Not at all Tempted by OTO in Q Talk</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Not-at-all-Tempted-by-OTO/m-p/79799#M1072</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;enough with the Temptations! I cannot believe the hosts can act all excited about the same old junk all of the time...and this one is not even cute. The concept is nice but those flowers are hideous. To me, the hosts lose some of the little credibility they have when they act all excited about such cheap junk, JMO.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>blondegirl</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-17T20:16:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Not at all Tempted by OTO</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Not-at-all-Tempted-by-OTO/m-p/79799#M1072</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;enough with the Temptations! I cannot believe the hosts can act all excited about the same old junk all of the time...and this one is not even cute. The concept is nice but those flowers are hideous. To me, the hosts lose some of the little credibility they have when they act all excited about such cheap junk, JMO.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2011 20:16:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Q-Talk/Not-at-all-Tempted-by-OTO/m-p/79799#M1072</guid>
      <dc:creator>blondegirl</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-17T20:16:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

