<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Buying a blender?  Get May 2013 Consumer Reports first in Kitchen</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Kitchen/Buying-a-blender-Get-May-2013-Consumer-Reports-first/m-p/318367#M12550</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Ninja at $60.00 vs. Vita Mix at $450.00.  I'm still glad I bought the Vita Mix.  You should read the article for the details on ice cream and soup making, Vita Mix still wins.  Plus, I don't like that top motor on the Ninja.  It just doesn't seem stable.  And Vita Mix has that long running reputation for durability. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>depglass</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-04-19T13:13:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Buying a blender?  Get May 2013 Consumer Reports first</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Kitchen/Buying-a-blender-Get-May-2013-Consumer-Reports-first/m-p/318367#M12550</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Ninja at $60.00 vs. Vita Mix at $450.00.  I'm still glad I bought the Vita Mix.  You should read the article for the details on ice cream and soup making, Vita Mix still wins.  Plus, I don't like that top motor on the Ninja.  It just doesn't seem stable.  And Vita Mix has that long running reputation for durability. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 19 Apr 2013 13:13:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Kitchen/Buying-a-blender-Get-May-2013-Consumer-Reports-first/m-p/318367#M12550</guid>
      <dc:creator>depglass</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-04-19T13:13:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

