<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: MAC vs CT in Beauty</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/MAC-vs-CT/m-p/7373234#M831781</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size="3"&gt;I like the MAC better. I've heard criticism on the way CT markets her products, that she exaggerates the effect they have. Also being overpriced. Personally, I would stay away from CT and try other brands. Several youtubers don't care about her.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 20:43:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>teganslaw</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-01T20:43:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>MAC vs CT</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/MAC-vs-CT/m-p/7373067#M831763</link>
      <description>&lt;H1&gt;NUDEGASM FACE PALETTE $75&lt;/H1&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.qvc.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/259009i971D5384D2C6ADCF/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="CT.jpg" title="CT.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;MAC's product isn't&amp;nbsp; on their website yet but based on other face products, it should be about 1/2 of the CT price.&amp;nbsp; The Mac product is going in my "I'm thinking about it" folder.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG src="https://community.qvc.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/259011iB65E02BF3F95BB17/image-size/original?v=v2&amp;amp;px=-1" border="0" alt="mac.jpg" title="mac.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Mar 2022 19:06:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/MAC-vs-CT/m-p/7373067#M831763</guid>
      <dc:creator>monicakm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-01T19:06:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

