<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic CA vs. Lav. in Beauty</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/CA-vs-Lav/m-p/238719#M53782</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt; I know all you Wenners have said that CA is the most astringent. I've tried it a few times and I think the Lav. is more astringent than the CA? Silly, I know, but since I'm new to CA, I was wondering if anyone else felt this way? I just ordered the Sept. TSV in Lav and may have to return the CA. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>scottygal</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-08-08T21:27:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>CA vs. Lav.</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/CA-vs-Lav/m-p/238719#M53782</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt; I know all you Wenners have said that CA is the most astringent. I've tried it a few times and I think the Lav. is more astringent than the CA? Silly, I know, but since I'm new to CA, I was wondering if anyone else felt this way? I just ordered the Sept. TSV in Lav and may have to return the CA. Any thoughts?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2012 21:27:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/CA-vs-Lav/m-p/238719#M53782</guid>
      <dc:creator>scottygal</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-08-08T21:27:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

