<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pure Pep SSc versus PTR Unwrinkle in Beauty</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/Pure-Pep-SSc-versus-PTR-Unwrinkle/m-p/167282#M39352</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;This is tempting alright her ingredients look right on, still my heart belongs to Peter, has anybody played the harlot here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Spunkyspouts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2012-02-22T06:51:41Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pure Pep SSc versus PTR Unwrinkle</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/Pure-Pep-SSc-versus-PTR-Unwrinkle/m-p/167282#M39352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;This is tempting alright her ingredients look right on, still my heart belongs to Peter, has anybody played the harlot here?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Feb 2012 06:51:41 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/Pure-Pep-SSc-versus-PTR-Unwrinkle/m-p/167282#M39352</guid>
      <dc:creator>Spunkyspouts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2012-02-22T06:51:41Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

