<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic It Cosmetics Packaging Issue in Beauty</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668938#M378802</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I started using this line back in June or July when I received the TSV.  I immediately fell in love with the Celebration foundation but it seemed to get used up awfully quickly.  I was hesitant to re-order because of the cost, but recently used a 20% coupon at Ulta.  The packaging looks identical but this new one seems to be lasting a lot longer than the one I got with the TSV.  It seems like they are always touting how these TSV kits include "FULL SIZE", but maybe I just assumed it was full size.  So, I checked the size in the kit compared to the size I bought at Ulta, and it is the same.  The TSV foundation did seem "lighter" and "fluffier", but, whatever.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;The topic I actually wanted to address is the way the compacts are designed.  After the TSV kit, I wanted to try a OTO eye shadow compact and I have the same issue with both the foundation and the eye shadow compacts.  They seem to be very hard to open.  Both compacts have a top that opens (for the actual product) and a bottom that opens (to hold the applicator/sponge/brush).  It seems that the applicators included in this bottom portion are cheap at best and I wonder why they even bother with the extra cost of designing a two-way compact which holds a throwaway applicator that probably nobody uses anyway.  I wish the It cosmetics compacts just opened one way and they didn't bother with the bottom half, which for some reason invariably opens a WHOLE lot easier than the top - go figure, LOL!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Suzeecat</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:26:14Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>It Cosmetics Packaging Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668938#M378802</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I started using this line back in June or July when I received the TSV.  I immediately fell in love with the Celebration foundation but it seemed to get used up awfully quickly.  I was hesitant to re-order because of the cost, but recently used a 20% coupon at Ulta.  The packaging looks identical but this new one seems to be lasting a lot longer than the one I got with the TSV.  It seems like they are always touting how these TSV kits include "FULL SIZE", but maybe I just assumed it was full size.  So, I checked the size in the kit compared to the size I bought at Ulta, and it is the same.  The TSV foundation did seem "lighter" and "fluffier", but, whatever.&lt;/P&gt; &lt;P&gt;The topic I actually wanted to address is the way the compacts are designed.  After the TSV kit, I wanted to try a OTO eye shadow compact and I have the same issue with both the foundation and the eye shadow compacts.  They seem to be very hard to open.  Both compacts have a top that opens (for the actual product) and a bottom that opens (to hold the applicator/sponge/brush).  It seems that the applicators included in this bottom portion are cheap at best and I wonder why they even bother with the extra cost of designing a two-way compact which holds a throwaway applicator that probably nobody uses anyway.  I wish the It cosmetics compacts just opened one way and they didn't bother with the bottom half, which for some reason invariably opens a WHOLE lot easier than the top - go figure, LOL!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 19:26:14 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668938#M378802</guid>
      <dc:creator>Suzeecat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T19:26:14Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: It Cosmetics Packaging Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668943#M378803</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You can write Jamie on her Facebook page. She will reply!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 23:55:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668943#M378803</guid>
      <dc:creator>CherryHugs</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T23:55:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: It Cosmetics Packaging Issue</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668948#M378804</link>
      <description>I have had a problem with the compact hinge breaking. I love the Celebration Foundation and use it everyday. But the last two compacts I bought have broken at the hinge point. I have to use a rubber band to keep the lid on if I take the compact with me. Very annoying! I think it is related to the double lid design. I haven't had trouble with any of her other traditional compacts.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 07 Feb 2015 01:14:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/It-Cosmetics-Packaging-Issue/m-p/1668948#M378804</guid>
      <dc:creator>Pitterpat</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-07T01:14:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

