<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic &amp;quot;Before&amp;quot; shots of devoted Wen Girls are terrible, but they look like recent photos!  Doesn't that work against him? in Beauty</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/quot-Before-quot-shots-of-devoted-Wen-Girls-are-terrible-but/m-p/70221#M11923</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I always wonder about this during the presentations.  Chaz will claim that his Wen Girls have not used regular shampoo for many months or even several years - and ONLY Wen.  He presents a terrible "before" photo then the "after" live presentation of the model with stunning hair.  But the "before" photos look recent - i.e. the QVC set looks current, the t-shirts are sometimes the same, the model doesn't look older.  How can he claim that the hair is so improved when the before is so obviously taken recently or at least during the time the model has supposedly been exclusive to Wen?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>GlowStar</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-15T01:43:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>"Before" shots of devoted Wen Girls are terrible, but they look like recent photos!  Doesn't that work against him?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/quot-Before-quot-shots-of-devoted-Wen-Girls-are-terrible-but/m-p/70221#M11923</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I always wonder about this during the presentations.  Chaz will claim that his Wen Girls have not used regular shampoo for many months or even several years - and ONLY Wen.  He presents a terrible "before" photo then the "after" live presentation of the model with stunning hair.  But the "before" photos look recent - i.e. the QVC set looks current, the t-shirts are sometimes the same, the model doesn't look older.  How can he claim that the hair is so improved when the before is so obviously taken recently or at least during the time the model has supposedly been exclusive to Wen?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 15 Apr 2011 01:43:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/quot-Before-quot-shots-of-devoted-Wen-Girls-are-terrible-but/m-p/70221#M11923</guid>
      <dc:creator>GlowStar</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-15T01:43:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

