<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Smashbox High Definition Foundation shade Rec? in Beauty</title>
    <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/Smashbox-High-Definition-Foundation-shade-Rec/m-p/64105#M10855</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking of trying Smashbox's High Definition foundation.  I currently wear Bobbi Brown Skin Foundation in Sand 2 or Smashbox Halo in Light.  Anybody know what shade would be best?  Not sure why I'm thinking of changing; I like both of these for different purposes.  But, you know how it is.  Somthing else just might be better.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Icegoddess</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-04-02T23:31:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Smashbox High Definition Foundation shade Rec?</title>
      <link>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/Smashbox-High-Definition-Foundation-shade-Rec/m-p/64105#M10855</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm thinking of trying Smashbox's High Definition foundation.  I currently wear Bobbi Brown Skin Foundation in Sand 2 or Smashbox Halo in Light.  Anybody know what shade would be best?  Not sure why I'm thinking of changing; I like both of these for different purposes.  But, you know how it is.  Somthing else just might be better.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 02 Apr 2011 23:31:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.qvc.com/t5/Beauty/Smashbox-High-Definition-Foundation-shade-Rec/m-p/64105#M10855</guid>
      <dc:creator>Icegoddess</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-02T23:31:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

