Jewelry

[Peyton_Kelley]

Jill and I will be doing a full presentation of this ring tonight during the 8:00 Pm Jewelry Show.  Please let us know what you think.

Best, Peyton

[itiswhatitis]

---

@Peyton_Kelley wrote:

---

@itiswhatitis wrote:

Sorry @Peyton_Kelley, but the inclusions are very visible even in the pic.  Fine Emeralds are a lot cleaner.  Besides, for the kind of money you all  are asking for is for the gold and not those stones.  Can't afford.

Good luck to anyone who can afford it.

---

Hi @itiswhatitis, our photographers always light a gemstone from behind.  This is not the proper way to photograph jewelry.   It does make the inclusions  more prominent than they are.   In person the stones are unbelievable in color and clarity.  Thank you very much for your comments.  Best, Peyton

---

I understand @Peyton_Kelley If the ring is any indication of the picture provided I wouldn't buy it.  Emeralds are notorious for their inclusions and I'd want to know of its treatment.  It is a rather softer stone so...

Thanks.

[perfumera De La Luz]

Gorgeous, inclusions et all!