Reply
Honored Contributor
Posts: 25,929
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Water levels on new washers - UGG!

I hate these water savers, even on super the tub is less than half full of water so you have to divide what would be a normal load into 2 loads. So where is the water savings?All this does is waste time and not really save any water.I also doubt the clothes are getting agitated enough in such a small amount of water.

My old washer - which was only 5 years old - filled the tub about 2/3 and had a 30 min soak cycle that I loved because the clothes got very clean. Now I have to do many more loads - there is no soak cycle to get things really clean and I haven't actually saved any water. 

It's a top loader with agitator. I want my old washer back.

Super Contributor
Posts: 402
Registered: ‎03-11-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!

I agree.  After buying my new washer a couple of years ago I was very discouraged after the first use.  The clothes were just being rubbed against each other in a very small amount of water (my machine has a glass top-it is not a front loader).  I decide to try it on the "bulky" setting.  On this setting the machine fills up with water and I have been using it like that ever since and am now very happy with the machine.

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,546
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!

Buy one used one on CL. Many people offer delivery.

 

 

Valued Contributor
Posts: 619
Registered: ‎07-08-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!

You can thank Congress.  Do you think any one of them has ever done a load of laundry?  Not many for sure.

 

https://cei.org/news-releases/federal-efficiency-rules-ruin-washing-machines

 

 

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,055
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!


@racada wrote:

I agree.  After buying my new washer a couple of years ago I was very discouraged after the first use.  The clothes were just being rubbed against each other in a very small amount of water (my machine has a glass top-it is not a front loader).  I decide to try it on the "bulky" setting.  On this setting the machine fills up with water and I have been using it like that ever since and am now very happy with the machine.


Thanks for the good tip! I am going to try this before I kick my new washer to the curb! Woman Frustrated

Esteemed Contributor
Posts: 5,837
Registered: ‎03-21-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!


@racada wrote:

I agree.  After buying my new washer a couple of years ago I was very discouraged after the first use.  The clothes were just being rubbed against each other in a very small amount of water (my machine has a glass top-it is not a front loader).  I decide to try it on the "bulky" setting.  On this setting the machine fills up with water and I have been using it like that ever since and am now very happy with the machine.



THANKS!!!!! for the great tip! 😄

Respected Contributor
Posts: 4,833
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!


@151949 wrote:

I hate these water savers, even on super the tub is less than half full of water so you have to divide what would be a normal load into 2 loads. So where is the water savings?All this does is waste time and not really save any water.I also doubt the clothes are getting agitated enough in such a small amount of water.

My old washer - which was only 5 years old - filled the tub about 2/3 and had a 30 min soak cycle that I loved because the clothes got very clean. Now I have to do many more loads - there is no soak cycle to get things really clean and I haven't actually saved any water. 

It's a top loader with agitator. I want my old washer back.


As do I.  The clothes are beat to death in a very small amount of water for much too long.  Finally it will fill, but not until things are beat up.  If you open the lid, there will be a little more water added, but not enough.  I want my old washer back too.  This is definitely not an improvement. DON'T FALL INTO THE TRAP OF BUYING THIS "NEW" INNOVATION.  IT'S AWFUL!! I OFTEN HAVE TO REWASH THINGS.

Honored Contributor
Posts: 25,929
Registered: ‎03-09-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!


@Perkup wrote:

 


@151949 wrote:

I hate these water savers, even on super the tub is less than half full of water so you have to divide what would be a normal load into 2 loads. So where is the water savings?All this does is waste time and not really save any water.I also doubt the clothes are getting agitated enough in such a small amount of water.

My old washer - which was only 5 years old - filled the tub about 2/3 and had a 30 min soak cycle that I loved because the clothes got very clean. Now I have to do many more loads - there is no soak cycle to get things really clean and I haven't actually saved any water. 

It's a top loader with agitator. I want my old washer back.


As do I.  The clothes are beat to death in a very small amount of water for much too long.  Finally it will fill, but not until things are beat up.  If you open the lid, there will be a little more water added, but not enough.  I want my old washer back too.  This is definitely not an improvement. DON'T FALL INTO THE TRAP OF BUYING THIS "NEW" INNOVATION.  IT'S AWFUL!! I OFTEN HAVE TO REWASH THINGS.


Unfortunately water savers are a requirement on many things like washing machines.It can't be avoided unless you buy an old used one.

I really hate the water saver on the toilet - you have to flush it about 2 or 3 times to get everything to go down. Where is there any water savings in that!

Respected Contributor
Posts: 2,905
Registered: ‎06-23-2014

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!

I like my LG washer but hate the low flush toilets!

Honored Contributor
Posts: 16,157
Registered: ‎03-10-2010

Re: Water levels on new washers - UGG!

I have heard,or read that speed queen is the only one that is good.

When you lose some one you L~O~V~E, that Memory of them, becomes a TREASURE.