Community Chat

[peace6576]

Ok, for those that prefer not to obatin news from The Post here's the link to the original report:

http://www.9news.com/news/investigations/jonbenet-ramsey/a-closer-look-at-the-dna-in-the-jonbent-ram...

[Puzzle Piece]

Someday, we will know more and possibly the finger can be pointed in the right direction. 

[Noel7]

@peace6576

This isn't from the Post report:

**********************************

The CBS report said her underwear was not made in America, and speculated the DNA on it could have been from packaging in the country of origin, which is why there is NO match to suspects.

The investigation team bought the same brand in a store, tested it while wearing gloves, and sure enough, there was unknown DNA on the underwear which had never been opened or touched in America before.

[Lesa]

John Andrew and/or his college friends.

Although I won't discus it, that is  who I would say killed JonBenet.

[libbyannE]

---

@bri20 wrote:

The DNA does not match the Ramseys.

It's from an unknown person or persons. 

I don't know how this implicates them at all. 

---

No, the evidence apparently indicates that the Dan might be a mix of people and thus contaminated, which is why it does not match

[chrystaltree]

The Ny Post?  Isn't that a tacky tabloid. a half step better than the National Enquirer?

[ROMARY]

Could have been acquaintances, neighbors, sons of adult friends, son's friends, or just someone who followed the family home from one of the pageants.  Really, it's a difficult case, no matter who, what, etc.  Not much evidence pointing in any one direction.  Maybe years later the person(s) will eventually confess.

[Pearlee]

---

@chrystaltree wrote:

The Ny Post?  Isn't that a tacky tabloid. a half step better than the National Enquirer?

---

@chrystaltree@   Oh for goodness sakes. Then read @peace6576 's post above instead with  a "respectable" link.  

[peace6576]

---

@Noel7 wrote:

@peace6576

This isn't from the Post report:

**********************************

The CBS report said her underwear was not made in America, and speculated the DNA on it could have been from packaging in the country of origin, which is why there is NO match to suspects.

The investigation team bought the same brand in a store, tested it while wearing gloves, and sure enough, there was unknown DNA on the underwear which had never been opened or touched in America before.

---

Yes, I know. I watched the CBS special and saw the forensic scientists conduct that experiment. It was very interesting and demonstrated incontrovertibly that no one should be implicated or exonerated based only on the transfer DNA found. 

I also found it interesting that the report included comments from the former US Attorney General and the former Governor of Colorado that corroborated the conclusion that the DNA evidence was not conclusive...what a bonehead that Lacey was..makes you wonder how people like that end up successful.

[proudlyfromNJ]

---

@chrystaltree wrote:

The Ny Post?  Isn't that a tacky tabloid. a half step better than the National Enquirer?

---

You would be wrong. The New York Post is not a tabloid.