Community Chat

[QueenDanceALot]

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

---

@QueenDanceALot wrote:

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

Oh, my goodness! Call the fashion police, quick!

A woman is showing "too much" cleavage!

*lol*

This isn't the 1700's.

Unless the woman is running around in a g-string bikini, it's all good. 

Besides, you see more skin on the beach than you do on the news.

*yawn*

---

I don't agree.  There is just nothing professional looking about a woman anchoring the news who is wearing a low cut top and a tight skirt jacked up her thighs.

Doesn't matter the year or the century.  It's tacky.

---

Gee, I don't oggle the women when I watch the news, but that's just me.

If you find what they are wearing so offensive, change the channel. There are plentry of other news sources out there.

---

Thank you for missing the point.

[cherry]

My criteria is giving people the freedom of wearing what they like,. the body, is just a body, and nothing to be ashamed about

[Plaid Pants2]

---

@QueenDanceALot wrote:

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

---

@QueenDanceALot wrote:

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

Oh, my goodness! Call the fashion police, quick!

A woman is showing "too much" cleavage!

*lol*

This isn't the 1700's.

Unless the woman is running around in a g-string bikini, it's all good. 

Besides, you see more skin on the beach than you do on the news.

*yawn*

---

I don't agree.  There is just nothing professional looking about a woman anchoring the news who is wearing a low cut top and a tight skirt jacked up her thighs.

Doesn't matter the year or the century.  It's tacky.

---

Gee, I don't oggle the women when I watch the news, but that's just me.

If you find what they are wearing so offensive, change the channel. There are plentry of other news sources out there.

---

Thank you for missing the point.

---

No......I got your point. Your feathers are all ruffled because a woman on tv dares to (gasp!) show some skin that's below her neck!

[QueenDanceALot]

---

@cherry wrote:

My criteria is giving people the freedom of wearing what they like,. the body, is just a body, and nothing to be ashamed about

---

I don't think that dressing appropriately for an occasion indicates shame in one's body.

I think it indicates pride in one's appearance.

[Plaid Pants2]

---

@QueenDanceALot wrote:

---

@cherry wrote:

My criteria is giving people the freedom of wearing what they like,. the body, is just a body, and nothing to be ashamed about

---

I don't think that dressing appropriately for an occasion indicates shame in one's body.

I think it indicates pride in one's appearance.

---

One can do both at the same time.

[cherry]

You are always in control, of what you want to see. Its easy to change the channel ,if you are offended

[Plaid Pants2]

---

@cherry wrote:

You are always in control, of what you want to see. Its easy to change the channel ,if you are offended

---

It must be just awful to be forced to watch these women who are running around with nekid boobs! *lol*

[hckynut]

As for you thread title question, it was a question, right? The network where I watch 99% of the weather reporting is on a national cable network. The women I have seen on this network are usually outside. Needless to say, in a city with 4 seasons, they dress accordingly for the weather at that time.

Very seldom see their male counterparts inside the studio either, so I guess they are treating them equally, even by PC standards.  Your thread just enlightened me. Are you saying I might enjoy it more watching our local, I assume, in studio Meteorologist?

hckynut(john)

[QueenDanceALot]

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

---

@QueenDanceALot wrote:

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

---

@QueenDanceALot wrote:

---

@Plaid Pants2 wrote:

Oh, my goodness! Call the fashion police, quick!

A woman is showing "too much" cleavage!

*lol*

This isn't the 1700's.

Unless the woman is running around in a g-string bikini, it's all good. 

Besides, you see more skin on the beach than you do on the news.

*yawn*

---

I don't agree.  There is just nothing professional looking about a woman anchoring the news who is wearing a low cut top and a tight skirt jacked up her thighs.

Doesn't matter the year or the century.  It's tacky.

---

Gee, I don't oggle the women when I watch the news, but that's just me.

If you find what they are wearing so offensive, change the channel. There are plentry of other news sources out there.

---

Thank you for missing the point.

---

No......I got your point. Your feathers are all ruffled because a woman on tv dares to (gasp!) show some skin that's below her neck!

---

Thank you for illustrating my point.

[cherry]

I do understand ,not everyone wants to see everything, that is presented on TV, and that is their right, but  I don't understand why they don't just opt out? It's so easy to do