Community Chat

[KathyPet]

GUess I must be one of the few who,doesn't really care how the babies were conceived.  it is none of my business.  

My MIL was 42 years old when she had my husband in 1946.  IT is not completely unheard of.  I hope the babies arrive healthy.

[JaneMarple]

---

@KathyPet wrote:

GUess I must be one of the few who,doesn't really care how the babies were conceived.  it is none of my business.  

My MIL was 42 years old when she had my husband in 1946.  IT is not completely unheard of.  I hope the babies arrive healthy.

---

My grandmother was 44 when she had my youngest Aunt in the same year that your husband was born, 1946. 

[YorkieonmyPillow]

I was 41 when I had my son.

All natural. 

[Lila Belle]

They've chosen to give life. Why would anyone object to that? I don't get it. Or is that just hypocrisy?

[SydneyH]

---

@Lila Belle wrote:
They've chosen to give life. Why would anyone object to that? I don't get it. Or is that just hypocrisy?

---

Very few are objecting however most of us don't believe the stories celebs feed us. 

[JaneMarple]

From my very first pregnancy, I never took it for granted that it was going to be simple and I feel the same towards every other expectant mpther/couple out there. 

[cherry]

I don't understand what story we were fed?  They said she is pregnant. Why would they lie about that?

[JaneMarple]

---

@cherry wrote:

I don't understand what story we were fed?  They said she is pregnant. Why would they lie about that?

---

People forget that celebrities are people too @cherry, we don't know in anyones's private lives (and why should we know) what they've endured. Miscarriage, still births infertility and other physical problems.

It's not our business! So give them the benefit of the doubt without relying on gossip sites!!!!!

[cherry]

I agree. Most people try to be happy for expectant parents, and wish them well

New life is a beautiful thing