Beauty

Quick links
Turn on suggestions Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Auto-suggest helps you quickly narrow down your search results by suggesting possible matches as you type.
Showing results for 
Search instead for 
Do you mean 
Reply
Contributor
WennerEsha
Posts: 45
Registered: ‎10-13-2012

613 in place of Re-moist

‎09-28-2014 09:09 PM

I thought I heard Chaz say during his visit that the reason he has not made a 613 re-moist is because 613 essentially replaces the re-moist as an everyday cleanser. Does anyone else remember what he said specifically about 613 v. re-moist?

Report Inappropriate Content
Message 1 of 3 (188 Views)
Labels:
Reply
0 Hearts
Super Contributor
okiebug
Posts: 2,007
Registered: ‎04-05-2010

Re: 613 in place of Re-moist

‎09-28-2014 09:15 PM

Yes, that's basically what he said, although I don't think he meant for it to completely replace the Remoist. The 613 has enough treatment based ingedients and is made specifically for a short, intense deep treatment in the shower, it does the same thing as the Remoist. Keep in mind it has more amino acids than the Remoist. Remoist is still needed, he was just saying there was no need for a 613 Remoist.

Report Inappropriate Content
Message 2 of 3 (188 Views)
Reply
0 Hearts
Contributor
WennerEsha
Posts: 45
Registered: ‎10-13-2012

Re: 613 in place of Re-moist

‎09-29-2014 06:10 AM

On 9/28/2014 okiebug said:

Yes, that's basically what he said, although I don't think he meant for it to completely replace the Remoist. The 613 has enough treatment based ingedients and is made specifically for a short, intense deep treatment in the shower, it does the same thing as the Remoist. Keep in mind it has more amino acids than the Remoist. Remoist is still needed, he was just saying there was no need for a 613 Remoist.

Thank you.

Report Inappropriate Content
Message 3 of 3 (188 Views)
Reply
0 Hearts